Humanity and Justice in Global Health: Problems with Venkatapuram's Justification of the Global Health Duty
Humanity and Justice in Global Health: Problems with Venkatapuram's Justification of the Global Health Duty
复制标题
全球卫生中的人性与正义：文卡塔普拉姆对全球卫生义务正当性的质疑
DOI：
10.1111/bioe.12224
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Buyx A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kollar E;Laukötter S;Buyx A
Sridhar Venkatapuram最近的工作是提供全球健康正义理论的最雄心勃勃和最复杂的方法之一。在这篇评论中，我们首先概述了Venkatapuram对全球卫生正义的方法的核心思想。然后，我们认为，该帐户最重要的要素之一--Venkatapuram的全球卫生责任基础--要么过于软弱，要么是在没有强有力的理由的情况下隐含地假设的。更明确地界定保护和促进卫生能力的义务是基于Martha Nussbaum版本的能力方法。我们认为，这一基础产生的是人道主义义务，而不是正义本身的义务。Venkatapuram的第二个论点来自健康的社会决定因素，相反，它是正义义务根基的更有力的候选者。然而，作为一种说明性的论点，它只是影射了一下，还没有写得足够清楚。我们提出看似合理的步骤来填补这一空白，并得出一些对全球卫生行动的影响。我们认为，这既加强了Venkatapuram的做法，也拓宽了全球卫生领域未来行动的基础。
One of the most ambitious and sophisticated recent approaches to provide a theory of global health justice is Sridhar Venkatapuram's recent work. In this commentary, we first outline the core idea of Venkatapuram's approach to global health justice. We then argue that one of the most important elements of the account, Venkatapuram's basis of global health duties, is either too weak or assumed implicitly without a robust justification. The more explicit grounding of the duty to protect and promote health capabilities is based on Martha Nussbaum's version of the capability approach. We argue that this foundation gives rise to humanitarian duties rather than duties of justice proper. Venkatapuram's second argument from the social determinants of health thesis is instead a stronger candidate for grounding duties of justice. However, as a justificatory argument, it is only alluded to and has not yet been spelled out sufficiently. We offer plausible justificatory steps to fill this gap and draw some implications for global health action. We believe this both strengthens Venkatapuram's approach and serves to broaden the basis for future action in the area of global health.
关于幸福的推理：努斯鲍姆证明能力的方法
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Alison M. Jaggar
通讯作者：
Alison M. Jaggar