Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with a reduced lymph node ratio in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.
Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with a reduced lymph node ratio in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-014-4192-6
复制
发表时间:
2015-04
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Fleming JB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Roland CL;Yang AD;Katz MH;Chatterjee D;Wang H;Lin H;Vauthey JN;Pisters PW;Varadhachary GR;Wolff RA;Crane CH;Lee JE;Fleming JB
The use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) for the treatment of potentially resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. In this study we sought to evaluate cancer-specific end-points in patients undergoing a NAC vs. a surgery-first (SF) approach with specific emphasis on lymph node metastases. Two hundred twenty two patients who underwent NAC and eighty-five patients who underwent SF were identified from 1990–2008 and compared for cancer-related end-points. Peripancreatic lymph nodes from one hundred thirty five neoadjuvant therapy patients were evaluated for histologic tumor regression. Patients who underwent NAC followed by surgery had improved overall survival and time to local recurrence compared to SF approach. NAC patients were less likely to have lymph node metastases (p=0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and had smaller tumors. On multivariate analysis, lymph node positivity was associated with SF, tumor size and the presence of LVI. NAC patient with N0 disease had equivalent outcomes to patients with a low-LNR (.01–0.15), while patients with a LNR >0.15 had reduced survival, and time to local and distant recurrence. 10/135 (7.4%) of NAC patients had evidence of tumor regression in at least 1 lymph node. Patients with potentially resectable PDAC selected to undergo NAC had improved survival and longer time to recurrence. Although some of these differences may be related to improvements in multimodality therapy completion rates, tumor regression in lymph node metastases exists and may demonstrate a biologic benefit of NAC compared to a SF approach.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Valsangkar, Nakul P.;Bush, Devon M.;Michaelson, James S.;Ferrone, Cristina R.;Wargo, Jennifer A.;Lillemoe, Keith D.;Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos;Warshaw, Andrew L.;Thayer, Sarah P.
通讯作者:
Thayer, Sarah P.
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Embuscado, EE;Laheru, D;Iacobuzio-Donahue, CA
通讯作者:
Iacobuzio-Donahue, CA
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Evans, Douglas B.;Varadhachary, Gauri R.;Wolff, Robert A.
通讯作者:
Wolff, Robert A.
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Katz, Matthew H. G.;Wang, Huamin;Fleming, Jason B.
通讯作者:
Fleming, Jason B.
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Sinn, Marianne;Striefler, Jana K.;Oettle, Helmut
通讯作者:
Oettle, Helmut