Time, Knowledge, and Power in Psychotherapy: A Comparison of Psychodynamic and Cognitive Behavioral Practices

Time, Knowledge, and Power in Psychotherapy: A Comparison of Psychodynamic and Cognitive Behavioral Practices
复制标题

心理治疗中的时间、知识和力量:心理动力学和认知行为实践的比较

DOI:
10.1007/s11133-017-9355-x
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Craciun, Mariana
Craciun, Mariana
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Craciun, Mariana

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

长期以来,时间一直被认为是专业控制的标志和组织工作的工具。然而,我们对时间性如何与专家的认知目标相交知之甚少。本文阐述了心理治疗中的时间模式如何塑造关于精神疾病的知识结构,以及这种关系是如何通过患者自己的干预来调节的。我专注于心理动力学和认知行为治疗实践,并从一家精神病学门诊的人种学观察和对心理治疗师的深入采访中获得数据。文章详细阐述了时间性的两个维度之间的构成关系:第一,时钟时间,即治疗的时间长度、疗程的长度和频率,以及治疗时间的流动;第二,疾病的时间认知论,它作为一种现象与过去、现在和未来一起构建。这两个方向的临床医生试图通过整合他们工作的这两个方面来构建特定的时间景观。然而,他们必须始终这样做,以回应患者自己的时间干预。通过关注专业工作的组织和疾病的时间性,本文汇集了医学社会学中两个截然不同的文献,即关于医学专业的学术和对疾病时间维度的社会科学理解。它表明,时间性是专家工作中如何协商知识和权力的构成要素。
Time has long been recognized as a marker of professional control and a tool for the organization of work. Yet we know less about how temporality intersects with experts’ epistemic goals. This article illustrates how the patterning of time in psychotherapy shapes the construction of knowledge about mental illness and how this relationship is mediated by patients’ own interventions. I focus on psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapeutic practices and draw on data from ethnographic observations in an outpatient psychiatry clinic and in-depth interviews with psychotherapists. The article details the constitutive relationship between two dimensions of temporality: first, clock time, namely the length of treatment, the length and frequency of sessions, and the flow of the therapy hour, and second, the temporal epistemics of illness, its construction as a phenomenon with a past, present, and future. Clinicians in the two orientations attempt to construct particular temporal landscapes by integrating these two facets of their work. Yet they must always do so in response to patients’ own temporal interventions. By attending both to the organization of professional work and the temporality of illness, this article brings together two largely distinct literatures within medical sociology, namely scholarship on the profession of medicine and social scientific understandings of the temporal dimensions of illness. It shows that temporality is constitutive of how knowledge and power are negotiated in expert work.
DOI: --
发表时间: 1990
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
G. Fine
通讯作者: G. Fine
时间:视角、标记和使用风格
DOI: --
发表时间: 1970
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Kathy Calkins
通讯作者: Kathy Calkins
个人叙述、社会职业和医学课程:分析多发性硬化症患者自传中的生活轨迹。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1990
期刊: Social Science & Medicine (1967)
影响因子: --
作者:
Ian Robinson
通讯作者: Ian Robinson
DOI: 10.1177/0022146510386794
发表时间: 2010-12-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
Timmermans, Stefan;Buchbinder, Mara
通讯作者: Buchbinder, Mara
时间性和经验
DOI: --
发表时间: 2003
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Rabelo;Iara Maria de Almeida Souza
通讯作者: Iara Maria de Almeida Souza