Mind the Gap: Missing Links in the Understanding of Traumatic Brain Injury and Mental Health.
Mind the Gap: Missing Links in the Understanding of Traumatic Brain Injury and Mental Health.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.12.001
复制
发表时间:
2022-03-01
影响因子:
10.6
通讯作者:
Stein MB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nelson LD;Stein MB
TBI is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with an increasing incidence and an estimated 55 million people living with traumatic brain injury-(TBI-) related disability (1). Disability after TBI appears to be driven largely by the diverse neurobehavioral—or mental health-related—consequences of the injury (2, 3). The reviews in this special issue of Biological Psychiatry discuss the current state of knowledge on TBI and mental health, but we cannot introduce them without acknowledging that definitions of TBI and mental health are continually evolving.Though commonly discussed as a single diagnosis, TBI is an amalgam of conditions comprising myriad pathophysiological features and clinical sequelae. While there is no doubt that injuries resulting in frank unconsciousness and acute neuroimaging findings reflect TBI, the “floor” of the injury spectrum has sunk lower in the past 25 years (4). In particular, clear outward signs of brain injury like unconsciousness are now recognized as not only unnecessary for diagnosis but uncommon after mild TBI (mTBI). The fact that TBI is not always readily identified by clinical signs during routine assessments presents challenges for identifying, treating, and studying this disorder. Exciting advances in detecting TBI through noninvasive (eg, blood-based and neuroimaging) biomarkers bring hope that the current state of uncertainty about what TBI is and how to identify it will improve in the foreseeable future (5). Just as definitions of TBI are hotly debated, the construct of mental health and, relatedly, psychiatric disease, lacks a universally agreed-upon definition. Definitions of mental health can emphasize normative cutoffs on psychological health scales, personal characteristics (eg, positive affect, subjective wellbeing, resilience), and differing end goals (eg, individual versus societal) and need to be appropriate to the contexts and cultures in which they are to be applied (6). An ambitious international mixed-methods study recently sought to identify the core
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Howlett JR;Nelson LD;Stein MB
通讯作者:
Stein MB
影响因子:
11
作者:
Wilson, Lindsay;Horton, Lindsay;Menon, David
通讯作者:
Menon, David
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Mayer AR;Quinn DK
通讯作者:
Quinn DK
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Meier TB;Savitz J
通讯作者:
Savitz J
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Olsen CM;Corrigan JD
通讯作者:
Corrigan JD