Mental health disparities research: the impact of within and between group analyses on tests of social stress hypotheses.
Mental health disparities research: the impact of within and between group analyses on tests of social stress hypotheses.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.032
复制
发表时间：
2010-04
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
Meyer, Ilan H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schwartz, Sharon;Meyer, Ilan H.
社会压力模型是研究社会地位与心理健康关系的主要理论框架。这些模式提出，偏见、歧视和相关的社会弊病给社会弱势群体（遭受耻辱、偏见和歧视的群体）带来额外负担，可能产生心理健康问题。研究人员使用了各种方法来研究这一假设。在本文中，我们认为，研究人员没有足够的注意到这种方法的变化，特别是组内的研究和组间变异的研究之间的区别，在解释社会压力理论的实证检验的影响。为了充分评估证据，我们需要仔细考虑不同方法的结果的趋同和差异。
Social stress models are the predominant theoretical frame for studies of the relationship between social statuses and mental health. These models propose that prejudice, discrimination and related social ills exert an added burden on socially disadvantaged populations (populations subjected to stigma, prejudice and discrimination) that can generate mental health problems. Researchers have used a variety of methodological approaches to study this hypothesis. In this paper we argue that researchers have not paid sufficient attention to the implications of this methodological variability, particularly the distinction between studies of within-group and studies of between-groups variation, in interpreting empirical tests of social stress theory. To fully evaluate the evidence, we need to carefully consider the convergence and divergence of results across diverse methodologies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
BARON, RM;KENNY, DA
通讯作者：
KENNY, DA
影响因子：
7.7
作者：
GREENLAND, S;ROBINS, JM
通讯作者：
ROBINS, JM
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kessler, RC;Berglund, P;Walters, EE
通讯作者：
Walters, EE
影响因子：
5
作者：
Dohrenwend, BP
通讯作者：
Dohrenwend, BP
影响因子：
0.9
作者：
JUDD, CM;KENNY, DA
通讯作者：
KENNY, DA