Leveraging SETS resilience capabilities for safe-to-fail infrastructure under climate change
Leveraging SETS resilience capabilities for safe-to-fail infrastructure under climate change
复制标题
利用 SETS 复原能力实现气候变化下安全无故障的基础设施
DOI：
10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101153
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Ahmad, Nasir
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kim, Yeowon;Carvalhaes, Thomaz;Helmrich, Alysha;Markolf, Samuel;Hoff, Ryan;Chester, Mikhail;Li, Rui;Ahmad, Nasir
基础设施转型需要认识到社会、生态和技术系统（SETS）的动态。SETS弹性方法挑战了基础设施规划和设计中技术领域的孤立。安全失效基础设施设计指导了确定SETS能力和气候弹性权衡的决策。由于基础设施修复的速度被轮廓、频率、随着极端天气事件的严重程度和严重程度的增加，基础设施服务中断和故障的可能性越来越大。基础设施规划和设计的故障安全方法通过确定社会、生态和技术系统（SETS）能力来为潜在的故障情景做准备，从而提高城市适应不确定气候未来的能力。在本文中，我们主张通过利用SETS弹性能力的机会和权衡来改造基础设施规划和设计，以有效地利用故障安全方法。从技术Vantage来看，传统的基础设施规划方法将社会和生态领域视为外部设计条件，而不是嵌入式系统特征。“故障安全”方法直接挑战技术领域的孤立性，因为必须认识到SETS领域在基础设施系统中是相互关联和相互依赖的，因为必须统一管理这些风险和系统的复原能力。
HighlightsInfrastructure transformation necessitates a recognition of social, ecological, and technological systems (SETS) dynamics.SETS resilience approaches challenge the isolation of the technological domain in infrastructure planning and design.Safe-to-fail infrastructure design guides decisions for identifying SETS capabilities and trade-offs for climate resilience.As the rehabilitation of infrastructure is outpaced by changes in the profile, frequency, and intensity of extreme weather events, infrastructure’s service disruptions and failures become increasingly likely. Safe-to-fail approaches for infrastructure planning and design improve the capacity of cities to adapt for uncertain climate futures by identifying social, ecological, and technological systems (SETS) capabilities to prepare for potential failure scenarios. In this paper, we argue for transforming infrastructure planning and design to effectively utilize safe-to-fail approaches by navigating the opportunities and trade-offs of SETS resilience capabilities. From a technological vantage point, traditional infrastructure planning approaches account for social and ecological domains as external design conditions rather than embedded system characteristics. Safe-to-fail approaches directly challenge the isolation of the technological domain by necessitating a recognition that SETS domains are interconnected and interdependent in infrastructure systems, as such risks and system capabilities for resilience must be managed cohesively.
登录
查看更多内容
生态修复的科学与实践：修复从业者的心理模型分析
影响因子：
--
作者：
Emily H. Walpole;E. Toman;M. Stidham;R. Wilson
通讯作者：
R. Wilson
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Abigail M. York;Caitlin Drummond Otten;Shauna Burnsilver;Steven L. Neuberg;J. Anderies
通讯作者：
Abigail M. York;Caitlin Drummond Otten;Shauna Burnsilver;Steven L. Neuberg;J. Anderies
作为社会生态技术系统的基础设施：跨学科对话的五个考虑因素
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Z. Grabowski;A. Matsler;C. Thiel;L. McPhillips;R. Hum;A. Bradshaw;T. Miller;C. Redman
通讯作者：
C. Redman
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
Guardaro, Melissa;Messerschmidt, Maggie;Redman, Charles L.
通讯作者：
Redman, Charles L.
影响因子：
11.2
作者：
Daniel Burillo;M. Chester;B. Ruddell;N. Johnson
通讯作者：
Daniel Burillo;M. Chester;B. Ruddell;N. Johnson