Dyadic concordance and associations of beliefs with intentions to learn carrier results from genomic sequencing.
Dyadic concordance and associations of beliefs with intentions to learn carrier results from genomic sequencing.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10865-021-00222-0
复制
发表时间：
2021-12
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Klein WMP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Huelsnitz CO;Turbitt E;Taber JM;Lewis KL;Biesecker LG;Biesecker BB;Klein WMP
尽管浪漫夫妻的和谐关系已经在广泛的健康行为中得到了证明，但很少有研究考察健康信念中的二元和谐。这项研究调查了同居的浪漫二元组的态度和信念的重合程度(即二元组一致性)，以及他们预测意图了解基因组测序结果的程度。在一项外显子组测序研究中，参与者-伙伴相互依赖模型被应用于来自81个二联体的横截面数据，这些人被调查了他们对学习携带者结果的风险感知、担忧、信息回避、态度和意图。信息回避倾向在伴侣之间呈正相关，但在其他信念上的一致性较低。个体的态度和信息回避预测了他们自己学习结果的意图。此外，合作伙伴的信息回避倾向预测了他们的合作伙伴学习结果的意图。未来的研究应该探索伴侣的信息回避可能会影响自己的意图和行为的机制。
Although romantic couple concordance has been demonstrated across a wide array of health behaviors, little research has examined dyadic concordance in health beliefs. This study examined the extent to which cohabitating romantic dyads’ attitudes and beliefs coincide (i.e., dyadic concordance) in addition to how well they predict intentions to learn genomic sequencing results. The actor-partner interdependence model was applied to cross-sectional data from 81 dyads in an exome sequencing study who were surveyed about their risk perceptions, worry, information avoidance, attitudes, and intentions toward learning carrier results. Information avoidance tendencies were positively correlated between partners, but there was low concordance on other beliefs. Individuals’ attitudes and information avoidance predicted their own intentions to learn results. Additionally, partners’ information avoidance tendencies predicted their partner’s intentions to learn results. Future research should explore mechanisms through which one’s partner’s information avoidance may affect one’s own intentions and behaviors.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1038/s41436-018-0341-9
发表时间：
2019-06
期刊：
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lewis KL;Heidlebaugh AR;Epps S;Han PKJ;Fishler KP;Klein WMP;Miller IM;Ng D;Hepler C;Biesecker BB;Biesecker LG
通讯作者：
Biesecker LG
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Lewis KL;Han PK;Hooker GW;Klein WM;Biesecker LG;Biesecker BB
通讯作者：
Biesecker BB
影响因子：
158.5
作者：
Christakis, Nicholas A.;Fowler, James H.
通讯作者：
Fowler, James H.
影响因子：
7
作者：
Biesecker, Leslie G.;Mullikin, James C.;Green, Eric D.
通讯作者：
Green, Eric D.
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Torvik, Fartein A.;Roysamb, Espen;Tambs, Kristian
通讯作者：
Tambs, Kristian