Inclusive and sustainable industrial development in China: An efficiency-based analysis for current status and improving potentials
Inclusive and sustainable industrial development in China: An efficiency-based analysis for current status and improving potentials
复制标题
中国包容性和可持续的工业发展：基于效率的现状和改进潜力分析
DOI：
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114876
复制
发表时间：
2020-06
期刊：
影响因子：
11.2
通讯作者：
Ke Wang
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Qianqian Yuan;Charles Fang Chin Cheng;Jiayu Wang;Tian-Tian Zhu;Ke Wang
包容性和可持续工业发展(ISID)呼吁采取行动，通过最大限度地减少环境足迹和加强社会包容来促进工业化。本研究提出了一种新的评价体系框架，以中国(2011年-2016年)为例对30个省(市)的信息产业发展水平进行评价。由于没有一个被普遍接受的ISID评价体系，本研究提出了ISID的双重提法，以使工业化带来的外部性之间的权衡合理化：(1)ISID代表各国通过减少在整体经济中表现出的不利环境和社会影响来促进工业化从而维持经济增长的愿望；(2)ISIDsdg9考虑了ISID的相同方面，但限制了工业部门内的外部性。本研究运用多向效率分析和极差调整法两种新发展的效率评价方法，对中国的信息安全问题进行了评价和分析。研究发现：在30个省份中，北京和天津分别是推进ISID和ISIDsdg9制度的基准省份。(Ii)在整个2011-2016年期间，中国在ISID和ISIDsdg9制度方面的整体表现略有改善。(3)在桶效应分析的基础上，SO2排放是实现ISID和ISIDsd9制度前沿地位的关键约束条件(V)在ISID和ISIDsdg9制度评价下，工业增加值年均增长潜力分别为2805.2亿元和9275.4亿元。本研究建议中国地方政府利用化石燃料减排政策，以北京和天津为基准省份，提高其在化石燃料减排方面的绩效。
Inclusive and sustainable industrial development (ISID) is a call for action to promote industrialization by minimizing the environmental footprint and enhancing social inclusion. This study proposes a new framework of an evaluation system to assess the ISID for 30 provinces in China (2011–2016). As there does not exist a generally accepted evaluation system of ISID, this study proposes a dual-formulation of ISID to rationalize the trade-offs among externalities brought by industrialization: (i) ISID represents the aspiration of countries to promote industrialization and consequently sustain economic growth by reducing the adverse environmental and social effects which manifest in the overall economy (ii) ISIDsdg9 considers the same aspects of ISID but limits the externalities within the industrial sector. This study applied two newly developed efficiency evaluation approaches, Multi-Directional Efficiency Analysis (MEA) and Range-Adjusted Measure (RAM), to evaluate and analyze the ISID for China. This study finds that: Among the 30 provinces, (i) Beijing and Tianjin are the benchmark provinces for promoting ISID and ISIDsdg9 regimes, respectively. (ii) Throughout the 2011–2016, the overall performance of China on ISID and ISIDsdg9 regimes has improved modestly. (iii) Based on the analysis of the barrel effect, SO2emission is the key binding constraint to achieving the frontier status of ISID and ISIDsd9 regimes (v) Under the evaluation of ISID and ISIDsdg9 regimes, the average annual growth potentials of industrial value added (IVA) is 280.52 billion CNY and 927.54 billion CNY, respectively. This present study recommends local government in China to advance their ISID performance by exploiting the policies targeting emission mitigation concerning fossil fuels while considering Beijing and Tianjin as the benchmark provinces.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Lei Chen;Yingming Wang;F. Lai;Feng Feng-Feng
通讯作者：
Lei Chen;Yingming Wang;F. Lai;Feng Feng-Feng
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
P. Zhou;M. Delmas;Aanchal Kohli
通讯作者：
P. Zhou;M. Delmas;Aanchal Kohli
影响因子：
12.8
作者：
T. Sueyoshi;M. Goto
通讯作者：
T. Sueyoshi;M. Goto
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Joe Zhu
通讯作者：
Joe Zhu
影响因子：
11.2
作者：
Li, Ke;Lin, Boqiang
通讯作者：
Lin, Boqiang