Examining Entrepreneurship Education Program Experiences of Women Faculty Engaged in Biomedical Research
Examining Entrepreneurship Education Program Experiences of Women Faculty Engaged in Biomedical Research
复制标题
考察从事生物医学研究的女教师的创业教育项目经验
DOI：
10.1007/s43683-023-00114-6
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Handley, Jacqueline
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ruiz, Aida Lopez;Shekhar, Prateek;Huang-Saad, Aileen;Handley, Jacqueline
虽然几个创业教育计划（EEPs）已经创建了教师，研究女性教师参与EEPs的经验是最小的，特别是在他们的学术研究的背景下可以忽略不计。为了解决这一差距，我们研究女性教师的看法和经验EEPs的背景下，生物医学（BM）的研究。研究问题如下：如何女教师BM研究重点的经验和/或感知EEPs？八个自称是追求B.M.的女教师。研究参与了本研究的深入采访。数据分析借鉴了现象学经验为基础的定性研究方法。三个关键主题出现在参与者的经验和对EEP的看法：（1）参与客户发现，（2）导航创业计划，（3）面对BM特定的研究挑战。客户发现被认为是最有影响力的成果，它推动教师探索他们的创新超出他们的实验室空间的影响;然而，由于BM环境的复杂性，客户发现过程是具有挑战性的。此外，在指导有关反馈交付和学生角色的计划时，注意到了一些挑战。最后，提出了一些针对生物医学的挑战，特别是缺乏学科多样性和EEP后对监管审批和资金的指导。我们预计这些基于研究的发现将为EEP的持续发展提供信息，其中包括女性STEM教师，特别是那些从事BM研究的教师。研究和实践的影响提出的背景下出现的调查结果。
Although several entrepreneurship education programs (EEPs) have been created for faculty, research examining women faculty experiences participating in EEPs is minimal and particularly negligible in the context of their academic research. To address this gap, we examine women faculty’s perceptions and experiences toward EEPs in the context of biomedical (BM) research. The research question examined is as follows: how do women faculty with a BM research focus experience and/or perceive EEPs? Eight self-identified women faculty who pursue B.M. research participated in in-depth interviews for this study. The data analysis drew on phenomenological experience-based qualitative research methodologies. Three key themes emerged with respect to participant experiences with and perceptions of EEPs: (1) engaging in customer discovery, (2) navigating the entrepreneurial program, and (3) facing BM specific research challenges. Customer discovery was identified as the most impactful outcome, and it pushed the faculty to explore the impact of their innovations beyond their laboratory spaces; however, the customer discovery process was challenging due to the complexity of the BM environment. Furthermore, several challenges were noted when navigating the program concerning feedback delivery and students' roles. Lastly, several BM-specific challenges were raised, specific to the lack of disciplinary diversity and post-EEP guidance on regulatory approvals and funding. We anticipate that these research-based findings will inform the continued development of EEPs that are inclusive of women STEM faculty, particularly those who are engaged in BM research. Implications for research and practice are presented in the context of the emergent findings.
登录
查看更多内容
学术创业中的性别差异：NSF I-CORPS 参与者的经验、态度和成果
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Epstein, Alanna;Duval-Couetil, Nathalie;Huang-Saad, Aileen
通讯作者：
Huang-Saad, Aileen
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
R. Harrison
通讯作者：
R. Harrison
DOI：
10.1177/2515127420929383
发表时间：
2020-06
期刊：
Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy
影响因子：
--
作者：
Nathalie Duval-Couetil;A. Huang-Saad;M. Wheadon
通讯作者：
Nathalie Duval-Couetil;A. Huang-Saad;M. Wheadon
STEM 领域的女性创业：文献综述和未来研究途径
DOI：
10.1007/s11365-019-00599-0
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
5.6
作者：
S. Poggesi;Michela Mari;L. Vita;L. Foss
通讯作者：
L. Foss
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
T. Duening;Robert A. Hisrich;M. A. Lechter
通讯作者：
M. A. Lechter