What to Put on the User: Sensing Technologies for Studies and Physiology Aware Systems
What to Put on the User: Sensing Technologies for Studies and Physiology Aware Systems
复制标题
用户应该穿什么：用于研究和生理学感知系统的传感技术
DOI：
10.1145/3173574.3173719
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Schmidt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Katrin Hänsel;Romina Poguntke;H. Haddadi;A. Alomainy;A. Schmidt
健康追踪器不仅提供了在现实环境中获取生理数据的简单方法，因为它们具有可负担的传感技术，它们进一步为HCI中的生理感知应用和研究提供了机会；然而，他们的表现并没有得到很好的理解。在本文中，我们报告了3种传感技术的质量发现：基于ppg的手腕追踪器（Apple Watch, Microsoft Band 2）， ECG带（Polar H7）和带有贴贴式ECG电极的参考设备（Nexus 10）。我们收集了21名参与者的生理数据（心率、皮肤电活动、皮肤温度）和主观数据，这些数据来自于他们进行体力活动和压力任务的组合。我们的实证研究表明，手腕装置提供了良好的传感性能在固定设置。然而，当参与者移动或任务需要体力活动时，它们缺乏准确性。根据我们的研究结果，我们建议在研究环境中为可穿戴设备设计一个文本空间，并反思研究环境中所调查技术的适当性。
Fitness trackers not just provide easy means to acquire physiological data in real-world environments due to affordable sensing technologies, they further offer opportunities for physiology-aware applications and studies in HCI; however, their performance is not well understood. In this paper, we report findings on the quality of 3 sensing technologies: PPG-based wrist trackers (Apple Watch, Microsoft Band 2), an ECG-belt (Polar H7) and reference device with stick-on ECG electrodes (Nexus 10). We collected physiological (heart rate, electrodermal activity, skin temperature) and subjective data from 21 participants performing combinations of physical activity and stressful tasks. Our empirical research indicates that wrist devices provide a good sensing performance in stationary settings. However, they lack accuracy when participants are mobile or if tasks require physical activity. Based on our findings, we suggest a textitDesign Space for Wearables in Research Settings and reflected on the appropriateness of the investigated technologies in research contexts.
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Hamilton-Craig, Christian;Fifoot, Allison;Branch, Kelley R.
通讯作者：
Branch, Kelley R.
DOI：
10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
发表时间：
1994-03-01
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
BRADLEY, MM;LANG, PJ
通讯作者：
LANG, PJ