Accounting for the Dominance of Control: Inter-party Dynamics and Restrictive Asylum Policy in Contemporary Britain

Accounting for the Dominance of Control: Inter-party Dynamics and Restrictive Asylum Policy in Contemporary Britain
复制标题

解释控制的主导地位:当代英国的政党间动态和限制性庇护政策

DOI:
10.1057/bp.2008.4
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
1.1
通讯作者:
Squire V
Squire V
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Squire V

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文描绘了自1997年新工党执政以来限制性庇护政策的发展,并评估了这一时期政党对庇护的政治反应。它考虑了近年来控制话语在政治光谱中占据主导地位的程度,并对当代英国限制性庇护政策的蓬勃发展进行了描述。通过这样做,本文挑战了传统的解释,即认为限制性政策是庇护申请数量增加和庇护制度“滥用”的直接结果。它还挑战了那些认为限制性政策直接源于民众要求加强控制的压力的解读。相反,这篇论文认为,限制性政策是由政党间的动态决定的,需要在更广泛的控制话语中加以理解。论文认为,这种控制话语在政治和公共或大众话语中越来越占主导地位,并且在国内和欧洲层面都很明显。
This paper charts the development of restrictive asylum policy since New Labour came into power in 1997, and assesses party political responses to asylum during this period. It considers how far a discourse of control has become dominant across the political spectrum over recent years, and develops an account of the flourishing of restrictive asylum policy in contemporary Britain. In so doing, the paper challenges conventional interpretations that perceive restrictive policies to be a direct result of rising numbers of asylum applications and ‘abuse’ of the asylum system. It also challenges interpretations that perceive restrictive policies to result directly from popular pressures to intensify controls. Instead, the paper argues that restrictive policy is conditioned by inter-party dynamics, which need to be understood in relation to a wider discourse of control. This discourse of control, the paper suggests, has become increasingly dominant both in political and also in public or popular discourse, and is evident both at the domestic as well as the European levels.
安全边界、避风港:术语自相矛盾?
DOI: 10.1080/0141987042000337830
发表时间: 2005
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Rosemary A. Sales
通讯作者: Rosemary A. Sales
DOI: --
发表时间: 2003
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Liza Schuster
通讯作者: Liza Schuster
特权模式:英国的公民权利
DOI: --
发表时间: 2001
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Z. Layton‐Henry
通讯作者: Z. Layton‐Henry
非自由主义与新庇护政治:自由主义的阴暗面
DOI: 10.1111/1467-923x.00327
发表时间: 2000
期刊: The Political Quarterly
影响因子: --
作者:
Randall S. Hansen;D. King
通讯作者: D. King
DOI: 10.1080/0141987042000337849
发表时间: 2005-05-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Flynn, D
通讯作者: Flynn, D