Participatory Forest Management: The experience of foreign‐funded programmes in the Kyrgyz Republic
Participatory Forest Management: The experience of foreign‐funded programmes in the Kyrgyz Republic
复制标题
参与式森林管理：吉尔吉斯共和国外资项目的经验
DOI：
10.1002/eet.1648
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
O. Ulybina
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O. Ulybina
本文研究旨在建立参与性森林管理（PFM），主要是在吉尔吉斯斯坦的核桃果林的外国资助的方案的经验。在审查了方案报告、非政府组织的证据和立法之后，我们认为，这些方案业绩不佳的主要原因是对在吉尔吉斯实施PFM的可行性的初始假设不正确，以及缺乏对适合当地的林业制度的分析。我们表明，在吉尔吉斯斯坦林业的历史上，没有实现PFM机制的重要先决条件，其实现受到苏联遗产，强大的非正式机构和贫困的阻碍。我们认为，PFM已经推出，没有清楚地了解它如何适应国家发展的总体愿景。此外，森林方案不适合吉尔吉斯斯坦的目的，因为它没有解决现有林业问题的宏观经济和环境根源。在需要跨部门、国家甚至跨界努力的情况下，不应过分强调地方社区的能力。西方捐助者与当地专家的相互、共同学习是关键，不应被自动采用进口概念所取代。版权所有© 2014 John Wiley & Sons，Ltd和ERP Environment
This paper studies the experience of foreign-funded programmes aimed at establishing participatory forest management (PFM), primarily in the walnut-fruit forests of Kyrgyzstan. Having reviewed programme reports, non-governmental organization evidence and legislation, we argue that the poor performance of these programmes is due largely to incorrect starting assumptions about the feasibility of PFM in the Kyrgyz context and a lack of analysis about locally appropriate forestry regimes. We show that there have been no significant preconditions for realization of PFM mechanisms in the history of Kyrgyz forestry, and their realization has been hampered by the Soviet legacy, strong informal institutions and poverty. We argue that PFM has been introduced without a clear understanding of how it fits in the overall vision of the country's development. Moreover, PFM is not fit for purpose in Kyrgyzstan, as it does not address the root macro-economic and environmental causes of existing forestry problems. The capacity of local communities should not be over-emphasized where cross-sectoral national or even cross-border efforts are required. Mutual, joint learning of Western donors with local experts is key, and should not be replaced by automatic adoption of imported concepts. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
让公众参与流域管理：国外经验教训范围分析
影响因子：
3
作者：
Benson D
通讯作者：
Benson D