Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12875-022-01705-y
复制
发表时间：
2022-04-28
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Recruiting healthcare providers as research subjects often rely on in-person recruitment strategies. Little is known about recruiting provider participants via electronic recruitment methods. In this study, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe and evaluate a primarily electronic approach to recruiting primary care providers (PCPs) as subjects in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a decision support intervention. We adapted an existing framework for healthcare provider research recruitment, employing an electronic consent form and a mix of brief synchronous video presentations, email, and phone calls to recruit PCPs into the RCT. To evaluate the success of each electronic strategy, we estimated the number of consented PCPs associated with each strategy, the number of days to recruit each PCP and recruitment costs. We recruited 45 of 63 eligible PCPs practicing at ten primary care clinic locations over 55 days. On average, it took 17 business days to recruit a PCP (range 0–48) and required three attempts (range 1–7). Email communication from the clinic leaders led to the most successful recruitments, followed by brief synchronous video presentations at regularly scheduled clinic meetings. We spent approximately $89 per recruited PCP. We faced challenges of low email responsiveness and limited opportunities to forge relationships. PCPs can be efficiently recruited at low costs as research subjects using primarily electronic communications, even during a time of high workload and stress. Electronic peer leader outreach and synchronous video presentations may be particularly useful recruitment strategies. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04295135. Registered 04 March 2020.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
McDonald, Alison M.;Knight, Rosemary C.;Snowdon, Claire
通讯作者：
Snowdon, Claire
改善临床试验中招聘和保留的干预措施：评估当前实践和未来优先事项的调查和研讨会。
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Bower P;Brueton V;Gamble C;Treweek S;Smith CT;Young B;Williamson P
通讯作者：
Williamson P
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Hummers-Pradier, Eva;Scheidt-Nave, Christa;Himmel, Wolfgang
通讯作者：
Himmel, Wolfgang
影响因子：
33.7
作者：
Dowell, Deborah;Haegerich, Tamara M.;Chou, Roger
通讯作者：
Chou, Roger
DOI：
10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.110075
发表时间：
2011-09-01
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Fulda, Kimberly G.;Hahn, Kristen A.;Cardarelli, Roberto
通讯作者：
Cardarelli, Roberto