The Scope of Usage-Based Theory
The Scope of Usage-Based Theory
复制标题
基于使用的理论的范围
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Paul Ibbotson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Paul Ibbotson
基于使用的方法通常利用一组相对较小的认知过程，如分类，类比和组块来解释语言结构和功能。本文的目的是首先回顾在何种程度上的“认知承诺”的使用为基础的理论已经成功地解释跨领域的实证研究结果，包括语言习得，处理和类型学。然后，我们看看使用为基础的理论的整体优势和劣势，并强调有重大的争论。最后，我们提请特别注意一组文化产生的结构模式，似乎超出了核心使用为基础的认知过程的解释。在这种情况下，我们得出了认知允许语言结构与认知需要语言结构之间的区别。以及解决需要更清晰的机制的概括和语法的基本单位，我们建议，整合文化产生的结构在现有的认知模型的使用将产生更紧密的预测语言如何工作。
Usage-based approaches typically draw on a relatively small set of cognitive processes, such as categorization, analogy, and chunking to explain language structure and function. The goal of this paper is to first review the extent to which the “cognitive commitment” of usage-based theory has had success in explaining empirical findings across domains, including language acquisition, processing, and typology. We then look at the overall strengths and weaknesses of usage-based theory and highlight where there are significant debates. Finally, we draw special attention to a set of culturally generated structural patterns that seem to lie beyond the explanation of core usage-based cognitive processes. In this context we draw a distinction between cognition permitting language structure vs. cognition entailing language structure. As well as addressing the need for greater clarity on the mechanisms of generalizations and the fundamental units of grammar, we suggest that integrating culturally generated structures within existing cognitive models of use will generate tighter predictions about how language works.
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
ASLIN, RN;PISONI, DB;PEREY, AJ
通讯作者：
PEREY, AJ
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ambridge
通讯作者：
Ambridge