Legitimacy, Trust and Compliance: An Empirical Test of Procedural Justice Theory Using the European Social Survey
Legitimacy, Trust and Compliance: An Empirical Test of Procedural Justice Theory Using the European Social Survey
复制标题
合法性、信任与合规性：利用欧洲社会调查对程序正义理论进行实证检验
DOI：
10.2139/ssrn.2234339
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Bradford
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Hough;J. Jackson;B. Bradford
本章介绍了我们（和同事）使用第五次欧洲社会调查设计的程序正义理论的大规模实证测试的结果。本章首先将对制度合法性的关注置于更广泛的“合规理论”框架内。然后，它阐述了其定义的失速，试图澄清什么是合法性的“滑”的概念，以及如何在不同的情况下使用这个词。然后，在测试各种假设的程序正义，我们采用了三重定义的经验（即感知）的合法性。我们将经验合法性定义为对行使权力和影响力的权利的承认和正当化，影响力主要是规范性的（而不是工具性的），重要的是，我们的同意、道德结盟和合法性的三方概念雅阁与一些成熟的社会心理认同和内化机制相一致。
This chapter presents findings from a large-scale empirical test of procedural justice theory, which we (and colleagues) designed using the fifth European Social Survey. The chapter first of all locates concerns about institutional legitimacy within a broader framework of ‘compliance theories.’ It then sets out its definitional stall in an attempt to clarify what is meant by the ‘slippery’ concept of legitimacy and how the term is used in different contexts. Then, in testing various hypotheses on procedural justice, we employ a tripartite definition of empirical (i.e. perceived) legitimacy. We define empirical legitimacy as the recognition and justification of the right to exercise power and influence, with influence mostly of the normative (rather than instrumental) variety, and importantly our tripartite notions of consent, moral alignment and legality accord with some well-established social psychological mechanisms of identification and internalisation.
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
J. Jackson;B. Bradford;M. Hough;J. Kuha;S. Stares;S. Widdop;R. Fitzgerald;M. Yordanova;T. Galev
通讯作者：
J. Jackson;B. Bradford;M. Hough;J. Kuha;S. Stares;S. Widdop;R. Fitzgerald;M. Yordanova;T. Galev