Systematic review and narrative synthesis of suicide prevention in high-schools and universities: a research agenda for evidence-based practice.
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of suicide prevention in high-schools and universities: a research agenda for evidence-based practice.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/s12889-021-11124-w
复制
发表时间:
2021-06-10
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Bantjes J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Breet E;Matooane M;Tomlinson M;Bantjes J
Youth suicide prevention in high-schools and universities is a public health priority. Our aim was to propose a research agenda to advance evidence-based suicide prevention in high-schools and universities by synthesizing and critically reviewing the research focus and methodologies used in existing intervention studies. Fourteen databases were systematically searched to identify studies which evaluate suicide prevention interventions delivered on high-school or university campuses, with before and after measures. Data from included studies (n = 43) were extracted to identify what, where, how and for whom interventions have been tested. Narrative synthesis was used to critically evaluate research focus and methodology. Study quality was assessed. Research has focused primarily on selective interventions, with less attention on indicated and universal interventions. Most evidence comes from North America and high-income countries. The target of interventions has been: non-fatal suicidal behaviour; confidence and ability of staff/students to intervene in a suicidal crisis; suicide-related knowledge and attitudes; and suicide-related stigma. No studies included suicide deaths as an outcome, evaluated eco-systemic interventions, explored how context influences implementation, used multisite study designs, or focused explicitly on LGBTQ+ youth. Two studies evaluated digital interventions. Quality of the majority of studies was compromised by lack of methodological rigour, small samples, and moderate/high risk of bias. Interventions often assume the existence of an external well-functioning referral pathway, which may not be true in low-resource settings. To advance evidence-based suicide prevention in educational settings we need to: conduct more high-quality clinical and pragmatic trials; promote research in low- and middle-income countries; test targeted interventions for vulnerable populations (like LGBTQ+ youth), evaluate interventions where death by suicide is the primary outcome; include translational studies and use implementation science to promote intervention uptake; evaluate the potential use of digital and eco-systemic interventions; and conduct multisite studies in diverse cultural settings. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11124-w.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1027/0227-5910/a000465
发表时间:
2017-09-01
影响因子:
3
作者:
Bailey, Eleanor;Spittal, Matthew J.;Robinson, Jo
通讯作者:
Robinson, Jo
DOI:
10.1027/0227-5910/a000014
发表时间:
2010-01-01
影响因子:
3
作者:
Cross, Wendi;Matthieu, Monica M.;Knox, Kerry L.
通讯作者:
Knox, Kerry L.
DOI:
10.1111/j.1744-6171.2002.tb00326.x
发表时间:
2002-04-01
期刊:
Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc
影响因子:
--
作者:
Eggert, Leona L;Thompson, Elaine A;Pike, Kenneth C
通讯作者:
Pike, Kenneth C
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Davies, Emma L.;Law, Cara;Winstock, Adam R.
通讯作者:
Winstock, Adam R.
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Auerbach RP;Mortier P;Bruffaerts R;Alonso J;Benjet C;Cuijpers P;Demyttenaere K;Ebert DD;Green JG;Hasking P;Murray E;Nock MK;Pinder-Amaker S;Sampson NA;Stein DJ;Vilagut G;Zaslavsky AM;Kessler RC;WHO WMH-ICS Collaborators
通讯作者:
WHO WMH-ICS Collaborators