Birth of the Cyberqueer
Birth of the Cyberqueer
复制标题
赛博酷儿的诞生
DOI：
10.2307/462933
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Donald E. Morton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Donald E. Morton
虽然酷儿的回归通常在当地被解释为受压迫的少数人对一个负面词的积极重新理解，作为一把伞的采用，以涵盖不同的边缘主体性，或者作为代际差异的标志，但这个词的再现必须被历史化-系统地和全球性地-作为一个理论，文化，以及社会变化，这是由于不加批判地接受（出于阶级原因）的前提下，滑稽的（后）现代理论在占主导地位的学术界和文化产业。通过提升欲望类别（意义模式）并遮蔽需要类别（生产模式），滑稽理论鼓励这样一种观念：在先进的技术文化中，变异的主观性--例如“网络酷儿”--占据了一个新的、自由的虚拟现实欲望超越了纯粹的需要，他们可以写下自己的历史，而不是被历史所写。说到底，（网络）女王不过是旧阶级意识形态的一种新表现。
While the return of queer is usually explained locally as an oppressed minority's positive reunderstanding of a negative word, as the adoption of an umbrella to cover diverse marginal subjectivities, or as a sign of generational difference, the term's reappearance must instead be historicized—systematically and globally—as one of the theoretical, cultural, and social changes that result from the uncritical acceptance (for class reasons) of the premises of ludic (post)modern theory in the dominant academy and the culture industry. By elevating the category of desire (mode of signification) and occluding the category of need (mode of production), ludic theory encourages the notion that in advanced technoculture, mutant subjectivities—such as the “cyberqueer”—occupy a new and freeing virtual reality of desire beyond mere need where they can write their own histories instead of being written by history. In the end, (cyber)queerity is but a new expression of an old class ideology.
DOI：
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291557.003.0008
发表时间：
2010-11
期刊：
Freud and Religion
影响因子：
--
作者：
Todd Dufresne;Gregory C. Richter
通讯作者：
Todd Dufresne;Gregory C. Richter