Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction
Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction
复制标题
假设立法:基于任务的教学案例
DOI:
10.1093/applin/ami013
复制
发表时间:
2005
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Swan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Swan
Task-based instruction (TBI) is frequently promoted as an effective teaching approach, superior to 'traditional' methods, and soundly based in theory and research. The approach is often justified by the claim that linguistic regularities are acquired through 'noticing' during communicative activity, and should therefore be addressed primarily by incidental 'focus on form' during task performance. However, this claim is based on unproved hypotheses, and there is no compelling empirical evidence for the validity of the model. Many advocates of TBI reject proactive syllabus design on doctrinaire grounds, while commonly misrepresenting 'traditional' classroom practice. While TBI may successfully develop learners' command of what is known, it is considerably less effective for the systematic teaching of new language. This is especially so where time is limited and out-of-class exposure unavailable, thus making heavily task-based programmes inappropriate for most of the world's language learners. The polarization of meaning-based and form-based instruction is unconstructive, and reflects a recurrent pattern of damaging ideological swings in language teaching theory and practice.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
R. S. Tomlin;V. Villa
通讯作者:
R. S. Tomlin;V. Villa
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1991
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Michael H. Long
通讯作者:
Michael H. Long
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Norris, JM;Ortega, L
通讯作者:
Ortega, L
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
関西大学人間活動理論研究センターCHAT Technical Reports No.6
影响因子:
--
作者:
Kite;Yuriko
通讯作者:
Yuriko