Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction

Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction
复制标题

假设立法:基于任务的教学案例

DOI:
10.1093/applin/ami013
复制
发表时间:
2005
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Swan
M. Swan
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Swan

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

基于任务的教学(TBI)经常被认为是一种有效的教学方法,优于“传统”方法,并且有坚实的理论和研究基础。这种方法通常被认为是合理的,即语言规律是通过在交际活动中“注意”获得的,因此应该主要通过在任务执行过程中附带的“关注形式”来解决。然而,这种说法是基于未经证实的假设,并且没有令人信服的经验证据证明该模型的有效性。许多 TBI 的倡导者以教条主义为由拒绝主动的教学大纲设计,同时通常曲解“传统”的课堂实践。虽然 TBI 可以成功地培养学习者对已知知识的掌握,但对于新语言的系统教学来说效果要差得多。在时间有限且无法进行课外接触的情况下尤其如此,从而使得基于任务的课程不适合世界上大多数语言学习者。基于意义的教学和基于形式的教学的两极分化是没有建设性的,反映了语言教学理论和实践中反复出现的破坏性意识形态波动的模式。
Task-based instruction (TBI) is frequently promoted as an effective teaching approach, superior to 'traditional' methods, and soundly based in theory and research. The approach is often justified by the claim that linguistic regularities are acquired through 'noticing' during communicative activity, and should therefore be addressed primarily by incidental 'focus on form' during task performance. However, this claim is based on unproved hypotheses, and there is no compelling empirical evidence for the validity of the model. Many advocates of TBI reject proactive syllabus design on doctrinaire grounds, while commonly misrepresenting 'traditional' classroom practice. While TBI may successfully develop learners' command of what is known, it is considerably less effective for the systematic teaching of new language. This is especially so where time is limited and out-of-class exposure unavailable, thus making heavily task-based programmes inappropriate for most of the world's language learners. The polarization of meaning-based and form-based instruction is unconstructive, and reflects a recurrent pattern of damaging ideological swings in language teaching theory and practice.
DOI: 10.1017/s0272263100012870
发表时间: 1994-06
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
R. S. Tomlin;V. Villa
通讯作者: R. S. Tomlin;V. Villa
注重形式:语言教学方法的设计特点
DOI: --
发表时间: 1991
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Michael H. Long
通讯作者: Michael H. Long
DOI: 10.1111/0023-8333.00136
发表时间: 2000-09-01
期刊: LANGUAGE LEARNING
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Norris, JM;Ortega, L
通讯作者: Ortega, L
语言学习视角:语言与认知模型
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊: 関西大学人間活動理論研究センターCHAT Technical Reports No.6
影响因子: --
作者:
Kite;Yuriko
通讯作者: Yuriko