Self-Persuasion: Evidence from Field Experiments at International Debating Competitions

Self-Persuasion: Evidence from Field Experiments at International Debating Competitions
复制标题

自我说服:来自国际辩论比赛现场实验的证据

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
The American Economic Review
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Joel J. van der Weele
Joel J. van der Weele
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Peter Schwardmann;E. Tripodi;Joel J. van der Weele

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

实验室证据表明,当人们不得不为一个给定的职位辩护时,他们会说服自己相信这个职位在事实和道德上的优越性。这种自我说服限制了沟通解决冲突和减少两极分化的潜力。我们在现场环境中测试这一现象,在国际辩论比赛中,随机分配有经验和积极性的辩论者来辩论某一主题动议的一方。我们在事实信念中找到自我说服,在自己的立场中找到自信。效应的大小比实验室中的要小,但对于一小时的论点交换和十倍于准确性的激励来说是强大的。(JEL C93、D12、D72、D83、D91、I23)
Laboratory evidence shows that when people have to argue for a given position, they persuade themselves about the position’s factual and moral superiority. Such self-persuasion limits the potential of communication to resolve conflict and reduce polarization. We test for this phenomenon in a field setting, at international debating competitions that randomly assign experienced and motivated debaters to argue one side of a topical motion. We find self-persuasion in factual beliefs and confidence in one’s position. Effect sizes are smaller than in the laboratory, but robust to a one-hour exchange of arguments and a tenfold increase in incentives for accuracy. (JEL C93, D12, D72, D83, D91, I23)
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20180310
发表时间: 2019-08-01
影响因子: 10.7
作者:
Andrews, Isaiah;Kasy, Maximilian
通讯作者: Kasy, Maximilian