Comparison of two-dimensional fractionation techniques for shotgun proteomics.
Comparison of two-dimensional fractionation techniques for shotgun proteomics.
复制标题
shot弹枪蛋白质组学的二维分级技术的比较。
DOI:
10.1021/ac8007994
复制
发表时间:
2008-09-01
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
Li, Lingjun
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dowell, James A.;Frost, Dustin C.;Zhang, Jiang;Li, Lingjun
Two-dimensional (2D) fractionation is a commonly used tool to increase dynamic range and proteome coverage for bottom-up, shotgun proteomics. However, there are few reports comparing the relative separation efficiencies of 2D methodologies using low microgram sample quantities. In order to systematically evaluate 2D separation techniques, we fractionated microgram quantities of E. coli protein extract by seven different methods. The first dimension of separation was performed with either reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), or strong cation exchange (SCX-HPLC). The second dimension consisted of a standard reverse phase capillary HPLC coupled to an electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ESI-QTOF MS) for tandem mass spectrometric analysis. The overall performance and relative fractionation efficiencies of each technique were assessed by comparing the total number of proteins identified by each method. The protein-level RP-HPLC and the high pH RP-HPLC peptide-level separations performed the best, identifying 281 and 266 proteins, respectively. The on-line pH variance SCX and the SDS-PAGE returned modest performances with 178 and 139 proteins identified, respectively. The off-line SCX had the worst performance with 81 proteins identified. We also examined various chromatographic factors which contribute to separation efficiency, including resolving power, orthogonality, and sample loss.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Eschelbach, JW;Jorgenson, JW
通讯作者:
Jorgenson, JW
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Delmotte, Nathanael;Lasaosa, Maria;Huber, Christian G.
通讯作者:
Huber, Christian G.
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Martosella, J;Zolotarjova, N;Boyes, BE
通讯作者:
Boyes, BE
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Chen, JZ;Balgley, BM;Lee, CS
通讯作者:
Lee, CS
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Marshall, J;Jankowski, A;Jackowski, G
通讯作者:
Jackowski, G