Benefit-Cost Analysis of Crime Prevention Programs

Benefit-Cost Analysis of Crime Prevention Programs
复制标题

犯罪预防计划的效益成本分析

DOI:
10.1086/681556
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
Crime and Justice
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Gowar
B. Gowar
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brandon C. Welsh;D. Farrington;B. Gowar

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

自 2000 年以来,犯罪预防项目的高质量效益成本分析数量已从 12 个增加到 23 个,华盛顿州公共政策研究所计算了许多效益成本比。收益通常是保守估计的,而成本通常是全面估计的。尽管如此,大多数项目的收益还是超过了成本,尤其是学前和认知行为项目、目标强化和改善照明、关怀社区项目和商业改进区。然而,不同的研究并没有对效益和成本进行可比较的估计;很少有分析具有很强的可比性。非常需要建立和使用标准的收益和成本清单。需要更好的研究设计,特别是随机对照试验。投资于预防比投资于监禁更具成本效益。进行重大投资以改善弱势儿童生活的时机已经成熟。
The number of high-quality benefit-cost analyses of crime prevention programs has grown from 12 to 23 since 2000, and numerous benefit-cost ratios have been calculated by the Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Benefits are often estimated conservatively, whereas costs are usually estimated in full. Benefits nonetheless exceed costs for most programs, especially for preschool and cognitive-behavioral programs, target hardening and improved lighting, Communities That Care programs, and Business Improvement Districts. However, benefits and costs are not estimated comparably in different studies; few analyses are strongly comparable. There is great need for the establishment and use of a standard list of benefits and costs. Better research designs are needed, especially including randomized controlled trials. It is more cost-beneficial to invest in prevention than in imprisonment. The time is ripe for major investment to improve the lives of disadvantaged children.
家庭支持干预的效果:十年随访。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1985
期刊: Child development
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Seitz,V;Rosenbaum,LK;Apfel,NH
通讯作者: Apfel,NH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2009.01.002
发表时间: 2009-03
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Doyle, Orla;Harmon, Colm P.;Heckman, James J.;Tremblay, Richard E.
通讯作者: Tremblay, Richard E.