Semicustomized Design Framework of Container Accommodation for Migrant Construction Workers

Semicustomized Design Framework of Container Accommodation for Migrant Construction Workers
复制标题

外来建筑工人集装箱住宿半定制设计框架

DOI:
10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001624
复制
发表时间:
2019-04
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Li Xiaodong
Li Xiaodong
中科院分区:
工程技术2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li Yulong;Li Guijun;Wang Tao;Zhu Yimin;Li Xiaodong

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

全世界数以百万计的移徙建筑工人为东道国或地区作出了重大的经济贡献,但往往遭受恶劣的住房条件。因此,必须探索新的方法来改善MCW的住房条件。基于可持续设计的理念,通过对经典价值工程过程的工作流程进行三个方面的改进,提出了集装箱舱位半定制设计框架。首先,提出了基于马斯洛需求层次理论的设计方案创新方法,其次,在设计过程的不同阶段整合两类决策者,从社会和心理角度满足MCW的多样化居住需求;第三,为更有效地量度母婴健康院的住屋满意程度,作者采用层次分析法(AHP)建立了量化不同设计方案工人住房满意度的评价方法,包括一个包含MCW心理因素的评价指标体系。该框架可用于通过优化设计方案的功能和成本来确定最适合MCW需求的集装箱住宿供应和价格。为了证明该框架的可行性,进行了案例研究。此外,该框架的局限性进行了讨论。(C)2019年美国土木工程师协会。
Millions of migrant construction workers (MCWs) worldwide make significant economic contributions to their host countries or regions but often suffer poor housing conditions. It is therefore important to explore new ways to improve housing conditions for MCWs. Based on the concept of sustainable design, the authors propose a semicustomized design framework of container accommodation through improvements to the job process of a classical value engineering process in three aspects. First, a method of design scheme innovation based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs is developed; second, two types of decision makers are integrated in different stages of the design process to satisfy the diversified housing needs of MCWs from social and psychological perspectives; and third, to better measure the housing satisfaction of MCWs, the authors developed an evaluation method of quantifying worker housing satisfaction with different design schemes using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, including an evaluation indicator system with MCW psychological factors. This framework can be used to determine the supply of container accommodation and prices that best fit the needs of MCWs by optimizing the function and cost of design schemes. To demonstrate the feasibility of the framework, a case study is conducted. In addition, the limitations of the framework are discussed. (C) 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
DOI: 10.1016/0263-7863(94)90031-0
发表时间: 1994-08
影响因子: 8
作者:
P. Rwelamila;P. W. Savile
通讯作者: P. Rwelamila;P. W. Savile
DOI: 10.3390/buildings5031037
发表时间: 2015-09
期刊: Buildings
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
H. Rijal;M. Humphreys;F. Nicol
通讯作者: H. Rijal;M. Humphreys;F. Nicol
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.001
发表时间: 2012-10
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Kevin A. Giriunas;H. Sezen;Rebecca B Dupaix
通讯作者: Kevin A. Giriunas;H. Sezen;Rebecca B Dupaix
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.002
发表时间: 2016-09
影响因子: 6.7
作者:
H. Islam;Guomin Zhang;S. Setunge;M. Bhuiyan
通讯作者: H. Islam;Guomin Zhang;S. Setunge;M. Bhuiyan
DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a4080
发表时间: 2015-12
影响因子: 1.2
作者:
Maria Pekkonen;U. Haverinen-Shaughnessy
通讯作者: Maria Pekkonen;U. Haverinen-Shaughnessy