Knowledge, belief, normality, and introspection
Knowledge, belief, normality, and introspection
复制标题
知识、信仰、常态和内省
DOI:
10.1007/s11229-017-1353-8
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Gratzl
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gratzl
We study two logics of knowledge and belief stemming from the work of Stalnaker (2006), omitting positive introspection for knowledge. The two systems are equivalent with positive introspection, but not without. We show that while the logic of beliefs remains unaffected by omitting introspection for knowledge in one system, it brings significant changes to the other. The resulting logic of belief is non-normal, and its complete axiomatization uses an infinite hierarchy of coherence constraints. We conclude by returning to the philosophical interpretation underlying both models of belief, showing that neither is strong enough to support a probabilistic interpretation, nor an interpretation in terms of certainty or the “mental component” of knowledge.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
0.6
作者:
Ronald Fagin;J. Geanakoplos;Joseph Y. Halpern;Moshe Y. Vardi
通讯作者:
Moshe Y. Vardi
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic
影响因子:
--
作者:
Dominik Klein;E. Pacuit
通讯作者:
E. Pacuit
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1979
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
W. Lenzen
通讯作者:
W. Lenzen
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
H. Wansing
通讯作者:
H. Wansing
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Ciabattoni;Revantha Ramanayake;H. Wansing
通讯作者:
H. Wansing