Open science in dementia care embedded pragmatic clinical trials.

Open science in dementia care embedded pragmatic clinical trials.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/pag0000644
复制
发表时间:
2022-03
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Gaugler JE
Gaugler JE
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Baker ZG;Gustavson AM;Mitchell LL;Gaugler JE

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

很少有痴呆症护理干预措施被转化为那些需要它们的人的医疗保健环境。嵌入式实用临床试验(ePCT)是一种可以加快研究转化为临床实践的时间框架的设计。随着美国国立卫生研究院和其他资助者投入大量新资源来提高国家进行痴呆症护理ePCT的能力,我们呼吁心理学家利用他们在开放科学方面的广泛专业知识来提高痴呆症护理ePCT的质量。本文提供了几项建议,以提高痴呆症护理和其他慢性病背景下ePCT的透明度和报告的严格性。我们说明这些建议的背景下,最近的试点务实的审判被称为门廊项目。Porchlight为服务客户和护理人员的志愿者提供培训,帮助他们提供更多的“痴呆症能力”支持。值得注意的是,这项试验没有包括利用开放科学实践的特别努力。我们讨论的好处和成本的门廊项目纳入开放科学的原则。
Few dementia care interventions have been translated to healthcare contexts for those who need them. Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials (ePCTs) are one design that can expedite the timeframe of research translation to clinical practice. As the National Institutes of Health and other funders commit immense new resources to increasing the nation’s capacity to conduct dementia care ePCTs, we call on psychologists to employ their extensive expertise in open science to improve the quality of dementia care ePCTs. This article provides several recommendations to enhance the transparency and reporting rigor of ePCTs in dementia care and other chronic disease contexts. We illustrate these recommendations in the context of a recent pilot pragmatic trial known as the Porchlight Project. Porchlight provided training to volunteers who serve clients and caregivers to help them provide more “dementia capable” support. Notably this trial did not include a special effort to make use of open science practices. We discuss the benefits and costs had the Porchlight Project incorporated open science principles.
DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igz028
发表时间: 2019-08-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
Isaacowitz, Derek M.;Lind, Majse
通讯作者: Lind, Majse
DOI: 10.1037/pag0000380
发表时间: 2020-02-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Goncalves-Pereira, Manuel;Zarit, Steven H.;Mateos, Raimundo
通讯作者: Mateos, Raimundo
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01542-7
发表时间: 2020-04-15
期刊: BMC GERIATRICS
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Gaugler, Joseph E.;Statz, Tamara L.;Roth, David L.
通讯作者: Roth, David L.
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0556-z
发表时间: 2016-01-18
期刊: BMC MEDICINE
影响因子: 9.3
作者:
English, Mike;Karumbi, Jamlick;Opiyo, Newton
通讯作者: Opiyo, Newton
DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716
发表时间: 2015-08-28
期刊: SCIENCE
影响因子: 56.9
作者:
Aarts, Alexander A.;Anderson, Joanna E.;Zuni, Kellylynn
通讯作者: Zuni, Kellylynn