Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings.
Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings.
复制标题
两种共优势树苗对不同林斑类型的生态生理响应
DOI:
10.1002/ece3.1368
复制
发表时间:
2015-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Fan, Weiyi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Duan, Renyan;Huang, Minyi;Kong, Xiaoquan;Wang, Zhigao;Fan, Weiyi
According to gap-phase dynamics theory, forests can be divided into four distinct patch types: gap patch (G), building patch (B), mature patch (M), and degeneration patch (D). Varying light conditions across patch types are one of the most important factors affecting the coexistence of vegetation. Mechanisms of coexistence can be understood through detailed knowledge of ecophysiological responses of codominant tree seedlings to patch types. The following study was conducted to determine ecophysiological responses of Cyclobalanopsis glauca (an evergreen broad-leaved species) and Bothrocaryum controversum (a deciduous broad-leaved species) to four different patch types. During the gap-phase dynamics, light intensity and the magnitude of change in the four different patches followed the order of: G > B > D > M. Both species had the greatest photosynthetic capacity in the G patch. Dry leaf mass per area (LMA), Chlorophyll a + b concentration (Chl), carotenoids (Car), and nitrogen content per area (Na) all responded to changes in light across patch type, but B. controversum showed greater sensitivity and changes than C. glauca. From G to M patch, the maximal quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) had a larger variation magnitude for B. controversum than for C. glauca. From G to M patch, B. controversum showed significant changes in gas exchange, while C. glauca showed only small changes. Ecophysiological trait partitioning of response to light in different patches provides a possible explanation of a coexistence mechanism.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Wyka, Tomasz P.;Oleksyn, J.;Zytkowiak, R.;Karolewski, P.;Jagodzinski, A. M.;Reich, P. B.
通讯作者:
Reich, P. B.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
SCHREIBER, U;SCHLIWA, U;BILGER, W
通讯作者:
BILGER, W
影响因子:
7.3
作者:
Yoshimura, Kenichi
通讯作者:
Yoshimura, Kenichi
影响因子:
2
作者:
Niinemets, Uelo
通讯作者:
Niinemets, Uelo
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Feijo, Natalia S. A.;Mielke, Marcelo S.;Lavinsky, Alyne O.
通讯作者:
Lavinsky, Alyne O.