Introduction: Domesticating Geopolitics
Introduction: Domesticating Geopolitics
复制标题
简介：驯化地缘政治
DOI：
10.1080/14650045.2020.1762575
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Carter S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carter S
构成“本土化地缘政治”这一特殊部分的论文最初来自于 2015 年 9 月在英国埃克塞特大学举行的 RGS-IBG 年会上围绕这一主题举行的两次会议。这些会议反过来又作为探索我们 Ludic 地缘政治研究项目中出现的关键主题的一种手段；如何思考儿童游戏的主要地域范围与更广泛的地缘政治事件的关系。正如我们在本期论文中更详细概述的那样，我们的研究关注的是在特定地点（英国）和特定时间（英国在伊拉克和阿富汗正在进行军事行动时）出现的特定玩具系列（女王陛下武装部队可动人偶系列）。然而，如何理论化和概念化国内与国际之间错综复杂的关系当然是一个更广泛的问题。会议背后的动力是与其他人开始对话，他们虽然在不同的实证环境中工作，但仍在努力解决其中一些相同的问题。这些会议还源于一种感觉，即更关键的地缘政治的一些承诺和主张，特别是与各种标量和空间双星的问题化有关的承诺和主张，可能尚未完全实现。虽然传统的地缘政治思想和国际关系的现实主义方法都倾向于依赖一系列二元论来理解全球政治的行为，但批判地缘政治学或多或少从一开始就试图破坏这些二元论的稳定并重新思考这些二元论。这些二进制文件中最持久的之一是“外国”和“国内”之间的二进制文件（参见 Campbell 1992；Enloe 2007）。正是在这种背景下，国内观念在传统/现实主义地缘政治学术中占据了最突出的地位。与“外国”不同，“外国”通常被视为地缘政治分析或框架的正确对象。更具体地说，如果在古典或现实主义思想中考虑过国内事务，那么它就会被认为是在国际事务领域之外，是从国际体系的暴力、无政府世界中的撤退。
The papers that make up this special section on ‘domesticating geopolitics’ initially arose from a double session around this theme from the RGS-IBG Annual Conference held at the University of Exeter, UK, in September 2015. Those sessions, in turn, arose as a means of exploring a key theme that was emerging within our Ludic Geopolitics research project; how to think through the largely domestic geographies of children’s play in relation to wider geopolitical events. As we outline in more detail in our paper in this issue, our research was concerned with a specific toy range (the Her Majesty Armed Forces action figure range) that emerged in a specific place (the UK), and at a specific time (whilst UK military action was ongoing in Iraq and Afghanistan). However, the question of how to theorise and conceptualise the entangled relationship between the domestic and the international is of course, a much wider problematic. The impetus behind the conference sessions was to begin a dialogue with others who, whilst working in different empirical settings, were nevertheless grappling with some of these same issues. The sessions also arose from a sense that some of the promise and claims of a more critical geopolitics, specifically in relation to the problematisation of various scalar and spatial binaries, had perhaps not been fully realized. Whilst both traditional geopolitical thought, and realist approaches to International Relations, have tended to rely upon a series of binaries in order to make sense of the conduct of global politics, critical geopolitics has, more or less from the outset, sought to de-stabilise and re-think such binaries. One of the most enduring of these binaries has been that made between the ‘foreign’and the ‘domestic’(see Campbell 1992; Enloe 2007). It is in this context that the idea of the domestic has featured most prominently within traditional/realist geopolitical scholarship; as distinct from the ‘foreign’, which is often taken to be the proper object of geopolitical analysis or framing. More specifically then, if the domestic has been considered at all in classical or realist thought, it has been conceived as outside of the realm of international affairs, as a retreat from the violent, anarchical world of the international system.
登录
查看更多内容
亲密的地缘政治：拉达克列城的宗教、婚姻和生殖机构
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Sara Smith
通讯作者：
Sara Smith
地缘政治的驯化：印度拉达克的佛教与穆斯林冲突以及婚姻和身体的监管
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Sara Smith
通讯作者：
Sara Smith
亲密战争
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
R. Pain
通讯作者：
R. Pain
家乡的地缘政治
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
K. Brickell
通讯作者：
K. Brickell