Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/jama.2009.813
复制
发表时间:
2009-06-10
影响因子:
120.7
通讯作者:
Cutler, Corey
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Koreth, John;Schlenk, Richard;Kopecky, Kenneth J.;Honda, Sumihisa;Sierra, Jorge;Djulbegovic, Benjamin J.;Wadleigh, Martha;DeAngelo, Daniel J.;Stone, Richard M.;Sakamaki, Hisashi;Appelbaum, Frederick R.;Doehner, Hartmut;Antin, Joseph H.;Soiffer, Robert J.;Cutler, Corey
The optimal treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) is uncertain. Current consensus, based on cytogenetic risk, recommends myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for poor-risk but not for good-risk AML. AlloSCT, autologous transplant and consolidation chemotherapy are considered of equivalent benefit for intermediate-risk AML. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials evaluating alloSCT versus non-alloSCT therapies for AML-CR1. To quantify relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit of alloSCT for AML in CR1. In subgroup analyses, RFS and OS benefit of alloSCT was determined for good-, intermediate- and poor-risk AML. Combining the search terms: ‘allogeneic’; ‘acut*’ and ‘leukem*/leukaem*/leucem*/leucaem*/aml’; ‘myelo*’ or ‘nonlympho*’, we searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials databases in March 2009. 1712 articles were accessed. Prospective trials assigning adult AML-CR1 patients to alloSCT versus non-alloSCT treatment(s) based on donor availability, and reporting RFS and/or OS outcomes on intent-to-treat, donor versus no-donor basis were identified. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Hazard ratios (HR) (with 95% CI) were determined. 24 trials and 6,007 patients were analyzed. Inter-study heterogeneity was not significant. Fixed effects meta-analysis was performed. HR of relapse or death with alloSCT for AML-CR1 was 0.80 (0.74–0.86). Significant RFS benefit of alloSCT was documented for poor-risk (HR 0.69 (0.57–0.84)) and intermediate-risk AML (HR 0.76 (0.68–0.85)); but not for good-risk AML (HR 1.06 (0.80–1.42)). HR of death with alloSCT for AML-CR1 was 0.90 (0.82–0.97). Significant OS benefit of alloSCT was documented for poor-risk (HR 0.73 (0.59–0.90)) and intermediate-risk AML (HR 0.83 (0.74–0.93)); but not for good-risk AML (HR 1.07 (0.83–1.38)). AlloSCT has significant RFS and OS benefit for intermediate- and for poor-risk AML, but not for good-risk AML in CR1.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Jüni, P;Witschi, A;Egger, M
通讯作者:
Egger, M
影响因子:
6.5
作者:
Keating, S;de Witte, T;Zittoun, RA
通讯作者:
Zittoun, RA
DOI:
10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
发表时间:
1986-09-01
期刊:
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS
影响因子:
--
作者:
DERSIMONIAN, R;LAIRD, N
通讯作者:
LAIRD, N
影响因子:
20.3
作者:
Cornelissen, Jan J.;van Putten, Wim L. J.;Lowenberg, Bob
通讯作者:
Lowenberg, Bob
影响因子:
2
作者:
Higgins, JPT;Thompson, SG
通讯作者:
Thompson, SG