The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1

The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1
复制标题

咆哮的肿瘤鼠:混合交换策略是重叠机构边界的区别来源1

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Fiona E. Murray
Fiona E. Murray
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fiona E. Murray

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

传统观点认为,当制度逻辑重叠时,混合体的产生就意味着崩溃、混合或轻松共存。作者提供了另一种解释:混合体可以保持独特的边界,可以从竞争中产生,而不是共存。这种另类解释的基础是对学术与商业边界的关键时刻的分析:对学术遗传学家的一项关键技术实施专利。在对商业侵犯的反应中,熟练的参与者(科学家)利用商业逻辑的资源并改变其含义,以建立保留独特机构的混合策略。因此,必须重新考虑混合体是从冲突中产生的,并通过边界工作产生,以保持逻辑的区别和弹性。
Conventional wisdom suggests that when institutional logics overlap, the production of hybrids signifies collapse, blending, or easy coexistence. The author provides an alternative interpretation: hybrids can maintain a distinctive boundary and can emerge from contestation, not coexistence. This alternative interpretation is grounded in an analysis of a critical moment at the academic‐commercial boundary: the enforcement of patents to a key technology on academic geneticists. In their reaction to commercial encroachment, skilled actors (scientists) took the resources of the commercial logic and transformed their meaning to establish hybrid strategies that preserved the distinctive institutions. Thus, hybrids must be reconsidered as emerging from conflict and produced through boundary work to maintain the distinction and resilience of logics.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540390054035
发表时间: 1997-04
期刊: JAMA
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Blumenthal;E. Campbell;Melissa S. Anderson;N. Causino;K. Louis
通讯作者: D. Blumenthal;E. Campbell;Melissa S. Anderson;N. Causino;K. Louis