Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the French Version of the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the French Version of the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale.
复制标题
法国版本的预期和人际娱乐量表的验证性因素分析。
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01296
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Favrod J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chaix J;Golay P;Fankhauser C;Nguyen A;Gooding DC;Favrod J
预期和消费性人际快乐量表（ACIPS），一种专门设计用于评估社交和人际快乐的享乐能力的测量方法，用于评估患者和普通人群中社交快感缺失的存在。本研究的第一个目标是验证ACIPS法文版的结构。第二个目标是验证一个，两个或三个因素的解决方案是最适合的ACIPS规模。法语版ACIPS在263名讲法语的研究生预科生或专业志愿者中进行了测试。对于验证性因素分析，数据被视为分类顺序，所有模型均使用稳健加权最小二乘估计量进行估计，并对平均值和方差进行调整。估计了三种模型。代表一般未分化的“快乐”的潜在结构的一个因素模型进行了首次测试的17个ACIPS项目。一个区分预期快乐和完成快乐的双因素模型接下来进行了测试。最后，一个三因素模型，包括子领域的亲密的社会互动，群体的社会互动，社会纽带进行了测试。单因素和双因素模型与数据拟合较差。然而，三因素模型的拟合优度是足够的。这些结果表明，喜欢在这三个子领域之一的互动的人更有可能喜欢在其他两个领域这样做。然而，在一个和三个因素模型之间的比较的基础上，这三种类型的相互作用可能不会被认为是不可区分的。相反，它们代表了不同的和理论上有意义的维度。这些结果表明，ACIPS法语版是一个有用的和有效的测量品味不同类型的社会关系的能力。
The Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS), a measure specifically designed to assess hedonic capacity for social and interpersonal pleasure, was used to evaluate the presence of social anhedonia in patients as well as the general population. The first goal of this study was to validate the structure of the French version of the ACIPS. The second objective was to verify whether a one, two or three factor solution is most appropriate for the ACIPS scale. The French version of the ACIPS was tested on 263 French-speaking pre-graduate students or professional volunteers. For the confirmatory factor analysis, data were treated as categorical ordinal and all the models were estimated using a robust weighted least squares estimator with adjustments for the mean and variance. Three models were estimated. A one-factor model representing a general undifferentiated “pleasure” latent construct was first tested on the 17 ACIPS items. A two-factor model distinguishing anticipatory-pleasure and consummatory-pleasure was tested next. Finally, a three-factor model including subdomains of intimate social interactions, group social interactions, and social bonding was tested. The one and two-factor models showed a somewhat poor fit to the data. However, the goodness of fit of the three factor model was adequate. These results suggest that individuals who enjoyed interaction in one of these three subdomains were more likely to enjoy doing so in the two other domains. However, on the basis of the comparison between the one and three factor models, these three types of interactions may not be considered as indistinguishable. Rather, they represent distinct and theoretically meaningful dimensions. These results show the French version of the ACIPS is a useful and valid scale to measure the capacity of savoring different kinds of social relationships.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者：
Bentler, Peter M.
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Favrod J;Nguyen A;Fankhauser C;Ismailaj A;Hasler JD;Ringuet A;Rexhaj S;Bonsack C
通讯作者：
Bonsack C
影响因子：
11.3
作者：
Gooding, Diane C.;Winston, Tina M.;Burgin, Chris J.
通讯作者：
Burgin, Chris J.
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Brown, Leslie H.;Silvia, Paul J.;Kwapil, Thomas R.
通讯作者：
Kwapil, Thomas R.
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Mote, Jasmine;Minzenberg, Michael J.;Carter, C. S.;Kring, Ann M.
通讯作者：
Kring, Ann M.