Digital Training for Non-Specialist Health Workers to Deliver a Brief Psychological Treatment for Depression in Primary Care in India: Findings from a Randomized Pilot Study.
Digital Training for Non-Specialist Health Workers to Deliver a Brief Psychological Treatment for Depression in Primary Care in India: Findings from a Randomized Pilot Study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3390/ijerph17176368
复制
发表时间:
2020-09-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Naslund JA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Muke SS;Tugnawat D;Joshi U;Anand A;Khan A;Shrivastava R;Singh A;Restivo JL;Bhan A;Patel V;Naslund JA
Introduction: Task sharing holds promise for scaling up depression care in countries such as India, yet requires training large numbers of non-specialist health workers. This pilot trial evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a digital program for training non-specialist health workers to deliver a brief psychological treatment for depression. Methods: Participants were non-specialist health workers recruited from primary care facilities in Sehore, a rural district in Madhya Pradesh, India. A three-arm randomized controlled trial design was used, comparing digital training alone (DGT) to digital training with remote support (DGT+), and conventional face-to-face training. The primary outcome was the feasibility and acceptability of digital training programs. Preliminary effectiveness was explored as changes in competency outcomes, assessed using a self-reported measure covering the specific knowledge and skills required to deliver the brief psychological treatment for depression. Outcomes were collected at pre-training and post-training. Results: Of 42 non-specialist health workers randomized to the training programs, 36 including 10 (72%) in face-to-face, 12 (86%) in DGT, and 14 (100%) in DGT+ arms started the training. Among these participants, 27 (64%) completed the training, with 8 (57%) in face-to-face, 8 (57%) in DGT, and 11 (79%) in DGT+. The addition of remote telephone support appeared to improve completion rates for DGT+ participants. The competency outcome improved across all groups, with no significant between-group differences. However, face-to-face and DGT+ participants showed greater improvement compared to DGT alone. There were numerous technical challenges with the digital training program such as poor connectivity, smartphone app not loading, and difficulty navigating the course content—issues that were further emphasized in follow-up focus group discussions with participants. Feedback and recommendations collected from participants informed further modifications and refinements to the training programs in preparation for a forthcoming large-scale effectiveness trial. Conclusions: This study adds to mounting efforts aimed at leveraging digital technology to increase the availability of evidence-based mental health services in primary care settings in low-resource settings.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
Cooper, Zafra;Doll, Helen;Fairburn, Christopher G.
通讯作者:
Fairburn, Christopher G.
DOI:
10.1007/s10488-017-0815-0
发表时间:
2018-03
期刊:
Administration and policy in mental health
影响因子:
--
作者:
Barnett ML;Gonzalez A;Miranda J;Chavira DA;Lau AS
通讯作者:
Lau AS
影响因子:
10.5
作者:
Jordans, Mark J. D.;Luitel, Nagendra P.;Patel, Vikram
通讯作者:
Patel, Vikram
影响因子:
4
作者:
Gale NK;Heath G;Cameron E;Rashid S;Redwood S
通讯作者:
Redwood S
DOI:
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817084825
发表时间:
2018-01-01
期刊:
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 14
影响因子:
--
作者:
Barnett, Miya L.;Lau, Anna S.;Miranda, Jeanne
通讯作者:
Miranda, Jeanne