Validity and reliability of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q).
Validity and reliability of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q).
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00776-012-0337-2
复制
发表时间：
2013-03
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Tanaka, Yasuhito
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Niki, Hisateru;Tatsunami, Shinobu;Haraguchi, Naoki;Aoki, Takafumi;Okuda, Ryuzo;Suda, Yasunori;Takao, Masato;Tanaka, Yasuhito
日本足部外科学会(JSSF)正在开发一种用于足部和脚踝相关病理情况的生活质量问卷调查工具。结果工具的主体(自我管理足部评估问卷，SAFE-Q第2版)由34个问卷项目组成，提供了5个分量表分数(1：疼痛和与疼痛有关；2：身体功能和日常生活；3：社会功能；4：与鞋子有关；5：一般健康和福祉)。此外，该工具有九个可选的问卷项目，提供体育活动分量表的分数。本研究的目的是评估SAFE-Q的重测信度。对876名患者和491名非患者进行了SAFE-Q的第二版测试，并对131名患者进行了重测信度评估。此外，对所有参与者进行SF-36问卷和JSSF量表评分表的测试。对子量表进行了评分，最终的总分在0(最不健康)到100(最健康)之间。所有得分的组内相关系数均大于0.7。五个分量表的平均分在60到75之间。这五个子量表很容易将患者和非患者区分开来。各分量表得分与JSSF量表和SF-36各分量表得分的相关系数在统计学上均极显著大于零(P<0.001)。五个JSSF比额表分类组的平均数落在一个相对较窄的范围内，这表明SAFE-Q标签足够相似，可以在所有JSSF比额表分类中使用。本研究表明，各分量表的重测信度均较高。因此，SAFE-Q是有效和可靠的。在未来，这将有利于测试安全-Q的响应性。
The Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) is developing a QOL questionnaire instrument for use in pathological conditions related to the foot and ankle. The main body of the outcome instrument (the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire, SAFE-Q version 2) consists of 34 questionnaire items, which provide five subscale scores (1: Pain and Pain-Related; 2: Physical Functioning and Daily Living; 3: Social Functioning; 4: Shoe-Related; and 5: General Health and Well-Being). In addition, the instrument has nine optional questionnaire items that provide a Sports Activity subscale score. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the SAFE-Q. Version 2 of the SAFE-Q was administered to 876 patients and 491 non-patients, and the test-retest reliability was evaluated for 131 patients. In addition, the SF-36 questionnaire and the JSSF Scale scoring form were administered to all of the participants. Subscale scores were scaled such that the final sum of scores ranged between zero (least healthy) to 100 (healthiest). The intraclass correlation coefficients were larger than 0.7 for all of the scores. The means of the five subscale scores were between 60 and 75. The five subscales easily separated patients from non-patients. The coefficients for the correlations of the subscale scores with the scores on the JSSF Scale and the SF-36 subscales were all highly statistically significantly greater than zero (p < 0.001). The means for the five JSSF Scale classification groups fell within a relatively narrow range, indicating that the SAFE-Q labels are sufficiently similar to permit their use for all of the JSSF Scale classifications. The present study revealed that the test-retest reliability is high for each subscale. Consequently, the SAFE-Q is valid and reliable. In the future, it will be beneficial to test the responsiveness of the SAFE-Q.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1302/0301-620x.94b2.27634
发表时间：
2012-02-01
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dawson, J.;Boller, I.;Jenkinson, C.
通讯作者：
Jenkinson, C.
DOI：
10.2106/00004623-200405000-00003
发表时间：
2004-05-01
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Johanson, NA;Liang, MH;Richmond, J
通讯作者：
Richmond, J
影响因子：
7
作者：
Dawson, J.;Doll, H.;Jenkinson, C.
通讯作者：
Jenkinson, C.
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
KITAOKA, HB;ALEXANDER, IJ;SANDERS, M
通讯作者：
SANDERS, M
DOI：
10.7547/87507315-88-9-419
发表时间：
1998-09-01
影响因子：
0.7
作者：
Bennett, PJ;Patterson, C;Baglioni, T
通讯作者：
Baglioni, T