Roles of NMDA and dopamine in food-foraging decision-making strategies of rats in the social setting.
Roles of NMDA and dopamine in food-foraging decision-making strategies of rats in the social setting.
复制标题
NMDA 和多巴胺在社交环境下大鼠食物觅食决策策略中的作用
DOI:
10.1186/s12868-015-0233-8
复制
发表时间:
2016-01-11
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Li CQ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li F;Cao WY;Huang FL;Kang WJ;Zhong XL;Hu ZL;Wang HT;Zhang J;Zhang JY;Dai RP;Zhou XF;Li CQ
In highly complex social settings, an animal’s motivational drive to pursue an object depends not only on the intrinsic properties of the object, but also on whether the decision-making animal perceives an object as being the most desirable among others. Mimetic desire refers to a subject’s preference for objects already possessed by another subject. To date, there are no appropriate animal models for studying whether mimetic desire is at play in guiding the decision-making process. Furthermore, the neuropharmacological bases of decision-making processes are not well understood. In this study, we used an animal model (rat) to investigate a novel food-foraging paradigm for decision-making, with or without a mimetic desire paradigm. Faced with the choice of foraging in a competitive environment, rats preferred foraging for the desirable object, indicating the rats’ ability for decision-making. Notably, treatment with the non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801, but not with the dopamine D1 or D2 receptor antagonists, SCH23390 and haloperidol, respectively, suppressed the food foraging preference when there was a competing resident rat in the cage. None of these three antagonists affected the food-foraging preference for palatable food. Moreover, MK-801 and SCH23390, but not haloperidol, were able to abolish the desirable environment effect on standard food-foraging activities in complex social settings. These results highlight the concept that mimetic desire exerts a powerful influence on food-foraging decision-making in rats and, further, illustrate the various roles of the glutamatergic and dopaminergic systems in mediating these processes.
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Jones-Cage, Chris;Stratford, Thomas R.;Wirtshafter, David
通讯作者:
Wirtshafter, David