Probabilistic Decision Making with Spikes: From ISI Distributions to Behaviour via Information Gain.
Probabilistic Decision Making with Spikes: From ISI Distributions to Behaviour via Information Gain.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0124787
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Gurney KN
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Caballero JA;Lepora NF;Gurney KN
Computational theories of decision making in the brain usually assume that sensory 'evidence' is accumulated supporting a number of hypotheses, and that the first accumulator to reach threshold triggers a decision in favour of its associated hypothesis. However, the evidence is often assumed to occur as a continuous process whose origins are somewhat abstract, with no direct link to the neural signals - action potentials or 'spikes' - that must ultimately form the substrate for decision making in the brain. Here we introduce a new variant of the well-known multi-hypothesis sequential probability ratio test (MSPRT) for decision making whose evidence observations consist of the basic unit of neural signalling - the inter-spike interval (ISI) - and which is based on a new form of the likelihood function. We dub this mechanism s-MSPRT and show its precise form for a range of realistic ISI distributions with positive support. In this way we show that, at the level of spikes, the refractory period may actually facilitate shorter decision times, and that the mechanism is robust against poor choice of the hypothesized data distribution. We show that s-MSPRT performance is related to the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) or information gain between ISI distributions, through which we are able to link neural signalling to psychophysical observation at the behavioural level. Thus, we find the mean information needed for a decision is constant, thereby offering an account of Hick's law (relating decision time to the number of choices). Further, the mean decision time of s-MSPRT shows a power law dependence on the KLD offering an account of Piéron's law (relating reaction time to stimulus intensity). These results show the foundations for a research programme in which spike train analysis can be made the basis for predictions about behavior in multi-alternative choice tasks.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Beck JM;Ma WJ;Pitkow X;Latham PE;Pouget A
通讯作者:
Pouget A
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Churchland AK;Ditterich J
通讯作者:
Ditterich J
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Beck JM;Ma WJ;Kiani R;Hanks T;Churchland AK;Roitman J;Shadlen MN;Latham PE;Pouget A
通讯作者:
Pouget A
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Ding, Long;Gold, Joshua I.
通讯作者:
Gold, Joshua I.
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
BRUSS, FT;ROBERTSON, JB
通讯作者:
ROBERTSON, JB