Policy Mobilities, Infrastructures, and Nonhuman Political Agency

Policy Mobilities, Infrastructures, and Nonhuman Political Agency
复制标题

政策流动性、基础设施和非人类政治机构

DOI:
10.1080/24694452.2023.2271554
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Anderson, Robert M.
Anderson, Robert M.
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Casellas Connors, John P.;Short Gianotti, Anne;Anderson, Robert M.

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

政策流动性研究探索了政策,特别是城市发展政策,如何在世界各地的网站之间传播,沿沿着变异,并在不同的背景下举行。在政策流动性文献中,特别关注循环基础设施,它促进了知识的接触、学习和交流,支持政策和“最佳做法”的(再)生产和流动。因此,政策流动性学术将政策执行理解为来自无数行为者和社会进程的关系集合。根据集合理论,这项工作一直关注非人类的物体和基础设施,但它很少关注非人类的生命。本文借鉴了比人类更多的地理,特别是对非人类生命和基础设施的新兴工作,将非人类行为者纳入政策动员的理解。我们提出了一个案例研究的郊区野生动物管理计划在马萨诸塞州,并讨论了人与非人的关系如何巩固政策的发展,转让和变化。从市政调查,深入访谈和文件分析的见解,我们认为,非人类是积极的生产政策组合和流动性的环境政策。特别是鹿,它们是活跃的参与者,参与了旨在管理社会生态动态和过程的政策循环,这些动态和过程还包括蜱虫、森林、细菌和许多其他非人类媒介。通过这种干预,在政策流动性的非人类生活,我们强调非人类行为者的政治机构,政策动员的物质性,以及非人类在塑造关系网络的作用。
Policy mobilities research has explored how policies—particularly urban development policies—spread among sites around the world, mutate along the way, and take hold in distinct contexts. Within the policy mobilities literature, there is particular attention to circulatory infrastructures, which facilitate encounters, learning, and exchange of knowledge that support the (re)production and movement of policies and “best practices.” Policy mobilities scholarship thus understands policy implementation as emerging from relational assemblages of myriad actors and social processes. Drawing on assemblage theory, this work has been attentive to nonhuman objects and infrastructures, nonetheless it has given little attention to nonhuman life. This article draws on more-than-human geographies, particularly emerging work on nonhuman life and infrastructures, to incorporate nonhuman actors into an understanding of policy mobilization. We present a case study of suburban wildlife management programs in Massachusetts and discuss how human–nonhuman relationships undergird policy development, transfer, and change. Drawing insights from municipal surveys, in-depth interviews, and document analysis, we argue that nonhumans are active in the production of policy assemblages and the mobility of environmental policies. Deer, in particular, are lively actors entangled in the circulation of policies designed to manage social-ecological dynamics and processes that also include ticks, forests, bacteria, and many other nonhuman agents. Through this intervention to situate nonhuman life in policy mobilities, we highlight the political agency of nonhuman actors, the materialities of policy mobilization, and the role of nonhumans in shaping relational networks.
地理学和公共政策:活动地理学、参与地理学和政策地理学
DOI: 10.1177/0309132507078955
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 7.1
作者:
K. Ward
通讯作者: K. Ward
超越大沟:巴拿马运河的政治、生态和基础设施
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028110.001.0001
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
A. Carse
通讯作者: A. Carse
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198836810.003.0006
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Descartes and the Ontology of Everyday Life
影响因子: --
作者:
Deborah J. Brown;C. Normore
通讯作者: C. Normore
解释俄亥俄州的狩猎参与:土地利用变化和新技术的故事
DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2015.1073409
发表时间: 2015
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
G. Karns;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;R. Gates
通讯作者: R. Gates
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00228.x
发表时间: 2006-12-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Head, Lesley;Muir, Pat
通讯作者: Muir, Pat