Comprehension Skill and Word-to-Text Integration Processes
Comprehension Skill and Word-to-Text Integration Processes
复制标题
理解技能和单词到文本的整合过程
DOI：
10.1002/acp.1419
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
F. Schmalhofer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Perfetti;C. Yang;F. Schmalhofer
摘要 我们研究了单词到文本整合过程中的理解技能差异，即单词的含义（在阅读时）与文本表示的联系。我们回顾了两项使用事件相关电位（ERP）的“在线”整合研究，以提供有关成人读者的单词到文本过程的细粒度时间数据。这些研究展示了单词到文本整合的指标，并显示了这些指标作为成人阅读理解技能的函数的差异。对于熟练的理解者来说，当关键词与先前文本中的词有明确的链接时，整合过程会反映在 N400 指标中；当其含义是先前词的释义时，整合过程会反映在 N400 和 P300 指标中。当后续的词到文本整合需要前向推理时，对于熟练的理解者来说效果并不可靠。理解能力较差的人表现出延迟且不太稳健的 ERP 效果，尤其是当意义释义是整合的基础时。我们讨论了整合过程中技能差异的重要性，重点是使用上下文相关的词义作为这些差异的可能来源。版权所有#2008 约翰威利父子公司。
SUMMARY We examine comprehension skill differences in the processes of word-to-text integration, the connection of the meaning of a word, as it is read, to a representation of the text. We review two ‘on-line’ integration studies using event related potentials (ERPs) to provide fine-grain temporal data on the word-to-text processes of adult readers. The studies demonstrate indicators for word-to-text integration and show differences in these indicators as a function of adult reading comprehension skill. For skilled comprehenders, integration processes were reflected in N400 indicators when a critical word had an explicit link to a word in the prior text and by both N400 and P300 indicators when its meaning was a paraphrase of a prior word. When forward inferences were required for subsequent word-to-text integration, effects for skilled comprehenders were not reliable. Less skilled comprehenders showed delayed and less robust ERP effects, especially when meaning paraphrase was the basis of the integration. We discuss the significance of skill differences in integration processes with a focus on the use of context-dependent word meaning as a possible source of these differences. Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
通讯作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.17.2.245
发表时间：
1991-03
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Gernsbacher;M. Faust
通讯作者：
M. Gernsbacher;M. Faust
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.202
发表时间：
2001-01-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Federmeier, KD;Kutas, M
通讯作者：
Kutas, M