From "Homegrown" to Research-Ready: Converting an Existing Practitioner-Developed Violence Prevention Intervention Into an Evaluable Intervention.
From "Homegrown" to Research-Ready: Converting an Existing Practitioner-Developed Violence Prevention Intervention Into an Evaluable Intervention.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/15248399211031540
复制
发表时间：
2022-11
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Taraskiewicz, Leah
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Embry, Venita;Macy, Rebecca J.;Moracco, Kathryn E.;Scheffey, Krista;Moore, Alexis;McCort, Agnieszka;Taraskiewicz, Leah
越来越多的人呼吁研究已经嵌入社区的有希望的预防方案（“本土干预措施”）。不幸的是，有有限的指导，以帮助研究人员准备这些类型的干预措施进行严格的评估。为了满足这一需求，本文介绍了我们的团队的过程中，修订一个有前途的社区为基础的性暴力预防干预的严格研究。我们在评估性评估（EA）方法、实施科学以及与社区合作伙伴的密切合作的指导下，对干预措施进行了广泛而反复的审查和修订。我们的EA过程使我们能够指定干预的核心组成部分，并开发一个“研究准备”的标准化课程与实施保真度评估。我们提供了从我们的过程中吸取的四个教训：（1）即使有现有的材料和基于社区的交付的广泛历史，社区开发的项目也不一定适合研究;（2）在整个修订过程中，研究人员和社区合作伙伴之间的密切合作和信任关系确保了核心项目组成部分的完整性得到维护，并且在不同的社区环境中实施是可行的;（3）对方案执行情况的观察是修订过程的一个关键部分;（4）必须为这种修订安排足够的时间和资源。
There is an increased call for research on promising prevention programs already embedded in communities (“homegrown interventions”). Unfortunately, there is limited guidance to help researchers prepare these types of interventions for rigorous evaluation. To address this need, this article presents our team’s process for revising a promising community-based sexual violence prevention intervention for rigorous research. Our extensive and iterative process of reviewing and revising the intervention was guided by evaluability assessment (EA) approaches, implementation science, and a close collaboration with our community partners. Our EA process allowed us to specify the intervention’s core components and develop a “research ready” standardized curriculum with implementation fidelity assessments. We offer four lessons learned from our process: (1) even with existing materials and an extensive history of community-based delivery, community-developed programs are not necessarily research-ready; (2) close collaboration and a trusting relationship between researchers and community partners throughout the revision process ensures the integrity of core program components are maintained and implementation in diverse community settings is feasible; (3) observations of program implementation are a crucial part of the revision process; and (4) it is important to budget adequate time and resources for such revisions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.8
作者：
Chorpita, BF
通讯作者：
Chorpita, BF
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Knox, Lyndee M.;Aspy, Cheryl B.
通讯作者：
Aspy, Cheryl B.
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Nnawulezi, Nkiru;Lippy, Carrie;Rodriguez, Rebecca
通讯作者：
Rodriguez, Rebecca
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Davies, Rick;Payne, Lina
通讯作者：
Payne, Lina
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Kutash, Krista;Cross, Brittany;Green, Amy L.
通讯作者：
Green, Amy L.