Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in 123I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism.
Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in 123I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0130274
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Salas-Gonzalez D
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brahim A;Ramírez J;Górriz JM;Khedher L;Salas-Gonzalez D
Intensity normalization is an important pre-processing step in the study and analysis of DaTSCAN SPECT imaging. As most automatic supervised image segmentation and classification methods base their assumptions regarding the intensity distributions on a standardized intensity range, intensity normalization takes on a very significant role. In this work, a comparison between different novel intensity normalization methods is presented. These proposed methodologies are based on Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) image filtering and mean-squared error (MSE) optimization. The GMM-based image filtering method is achieved according to a probability threshold that removes the clusters whose likelihood are negligible in the non-specific regions. The MSE optimization method consists of a linear transformation that is obtained by minimizing the MSE in the non-specific region between the intensity normalized image and the template. The proposed intensity normalization methods are compared to: i) a standard approach based on the specific-to-non-specific binding ratio that is widely used, and ii) a linear approach based on the α-stable distribution. This comparison is performed on a DaTSCAN image database comprising analysis and classification stages for the development of a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system for Parkinsonian syndrome (PS) detection. In addition, these proposed methods correct spatially varying artifacts that modulate the intensity of the images. Finally, using the leave-one-out cross-validation technique over these two approaches, the system achieves results up to a 92.91% of accuracy, 94.64% of sensitivity and 92.65 % of specificity, outperforming previous approaches based on a standard and a linear approach, which are used as a reference. The use of advanced intensity normalization techniques, such as the GMM-based image filtering and the MSE optimization improves the diagnosis of PS.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Aladjem, M
通讯作者:
Aladjem, M
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Burges, CJC
通讯作者:
Burges, CJC
影响因子:
6
作者:
Khedher, L.;Ramirez, J.;Segovia, F.
通讯作者:
Segovia, F.
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Goldberger, J;Gordon, S;Greenspan, H
通讯作者:
Greenspan, H
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Bao, SY;Wu, JC;Tang, J
通讯作者:
Tang, J