THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN L2 LISTENING AND METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS ACROSS LISTENING TESTS AND LEARNER SAMPLES

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN L2 LISTENING AND METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS ACROSS LISTENING TESTS AND LEARNER SAMPLES
复制标题

听力测试和学习者样本中二语听力和元认知意识之间的关系

DOI:
10.1080/10904018.2021.1955683
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Koizumi Rie
Koizumi Rie
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
In’nami Yo;Koizumi Rie

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

为了更好地理解第二语言听力理解和元认知意识之间的关系,我们考察了听力测试和学习者样本的调节作用,同时关注了元认知意识的各个方面。在日本一所大学学习英语作为外语的学生(n=75;2019年)参加了托福考试(TOEFL ITP®),这是一种纸质托福;托福互联网考试(TOEFL IBT®);以及元认知意识听力问卷(MALQ)。另一组学生(n=107;2020年)参加了托福、ITP和MALQ。对2019年的队列结果进行了随机森林分析,结果表明,在两次听力测试中,人的知识、心理翻译和定向注意与听力理解有关,重要性依次为:人的知识、心理翻译和定向注意。在这两个听力测试中,问题解决都没有关系。此外,计划和评估策略只在托福考试中与听力理解有关。2019年和2020年托福ITP成绩的比较显示,只有人的知识与两个人的听力理解有关,这表明人的知识的概括性很强,其余的元认知策略在学习者中的概括性很弱。最后讨论了研究的意义和未来的发展方向。
To better understand the relationship between second-language (L2) listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness, we examined the moderating effects of listening tests and learner samples while focusing on aspects of metacognitive awareness. Students of English-as-a-foreign-language at a Japanese university (n= 75; the 2019 cohort) took the Test of English as a Foreign Language Institutional Testing Program (TOEFL ITP®) test, a paper-based TOEFL; the TOEFL Internet-based test (TOEFL iBT®); and the Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ). Another group of students (n= 107; the 2020 cohort) took the TOEFL ITP and MALQ. Random forest analysis was applied to the results of the 2019 cohort, showing that, in order of importance, person knowledge, mental translation, and directed attention were related to listening comprehension in both listening tests. Problem solving was not related in either listening test. Further, planning and evaluation strategies were related to listening comprehension only in the TOEFL ITP. Comparison between the TOEFL ITP results of the 2019 and 2020 cohorts showed that only person knowledge was related to listening comprehension across the two cohorts, indicating a strong generalizability of person knowledge and weak generalizability of the remaining metacognitive strategies across learners. Implications and future directions are discussed.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Kozo Yanagawa
通讯作者: Kozo Yanagawa
DOI: 10.1017/s0958344006000425
发表时间: 2006
期刊: ReCALL
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
David Coniam
通讯作者: David Coniam
听力理解测试:一项内省性研究1
DOI: 10.1177/026553229100800105
发表时间: 1991
期刊: Language Testing
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
G. Buck
通讯作者: G. Buck
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02043.x
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: --
作者:
P. Carrell
通讯作者: P. Carrell
听力评估中的应试策略研究:眼动追踪与自我报告问卷的比较研究
DOI: 10.1080/10904018.2021.1883433
发表时间: 2021
影响因子: --
作者:
Andralyn Rui Lin Low;Vahid Aryadoust
通讯作者: Vahid Aryadoust