Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises.

Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692785
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Qu T
Qu T
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fan L;Kong L;Li L;Qu T

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这项研究旨在调查人类听者是否能够在频率恒定(频率稳定)或频率变化(单向频率滑动)的噪声中检测到嵌入在双耳相同的任意噪声标记[相关性中断,耳间相关性中断(BIAC)]中的双耳不相关的任意噪声片段。在实验一中,对10名听力正常的受试者进行了上滑、下滑和稳频噪声的测试。在实验2a中,对21名听力正常的受试者进行了上滑音和稳频音的测试。在实验2b中,另外19名听力正常的参与者被测试了下行和频率稳定的噪音。听者能够在频率稳定的噪声(中心频率=400赫兹)和两种类型的频率滑动噪声(中心频率:100至1,600赫兹)中检测到BIAC。在频率滑动噪声中检测BIAC的持续时间阈值显著长于频率稳定噪声(实验1),而在频率滑动噪声中检测到持续时间固定的BIAC(200ms)的最长耳间延迟显著短于频率稳定噪声(实验2)。虽然人类听众可以在频率滑动噪声中检测到BIAC,但他们在频率滑动噪声中对BIAC的敏感度远远低于频率稳定噪声中的BIAC。
This study was to investigate whether human listeners are able to detect a binaurally uncorrelated arbitrary-noise fragment embedded in binaurally identical arbitrary-noise markers [a break in correlation, break in interaural correlation (BIAC)] in either frequency-constant (frequency-steady) or frequency-varied (unidirectionally frequency gliding) noise. Ten participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 1 for up-gliding, down-gliding, and frequency-steady noises. Twenty-one participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 2a for both up-gliding and frequency-steady noises. Another nineteen participants with normal hearing were tested in Experiment 2b for both down-gliding and frequency-steady noises. Listeners were able to detect a BIAC in the frequency-steady noise (center frequency = 400 Hz) and two types of frequency-gliding noises (center frequency: between 100 and 1,600 Hz). The duration threshold for detecting the BIAC in frequency-gliding noises was significantly longer than that in the frequency-steady noise (Experiment 1), and the longest interaural delay at which a duration-fixed BIAC (200 ms) in frequency-gliding noises could be detected was significantly shorter than that in the frequency-steady noise (Experiment 2). Although human listeners can detect a BIAC in frequency-gliding noises, their sensitivity to a BIAC in frequency-gliding noises is much lower than that in frequency-steady noise.
DOI: 10.1121/1.1383296
发表时间: 2001-08-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Culling, JF;Colburn, HS;Spurchise, M
通讯作者: Spurchise, M
人体头皮诱发电位与声源及其模拟反射之间的融合相关
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209173
发表时间: 2019-01-09
期刊: PLOS ONE
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Huang, Ying;Lu, Hao;Li, Liang
通讯作者: Li, Liang
DOI: 10.3758/bf03203059
发表时间: 1983-01-01
期刊: PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
影响因子: --
作者:
JENKINS, JJ;STRANGE, W;EDMAN, TR
通讯作者: EDMAN, TR
DOI: 10.1121/1.385821
发表时间: 1981-01-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
GABRIEL, KJ;COLBURN, HS
通讯作者: COLBURN, HS
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1266-05.2005
发表时间: 2005-09-14
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Chait, M;Poeppel, D;Simon, JZ
通讯作者: Simon, JZ