Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in women living with depression.
Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in women living with depression.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1471-2458-11-465
复制
发表时间：
2011-06-12
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
Carter T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Callaghan P;Khalil E;Morres I;Carter T
运动可能对治疗抑郁症有效，但在抑郁症女性中测试其效果的试验很少。比较38名抑郁症女性的首选强度运动与规定强度运动的效果。一项实用的随机对照试验，将12个训练阶段的首选强度与12个训练阶段的规定强度进行比较。比较两组间贝克抑郁量表（BDI）、罗森伯格自尊量表（RSES）、一般健康问卷12（GHQ-12）、心率（HR）、主观用力评分量表（RPE）、抑郁症生活质量量表（QLDS）、多维感知社会支持量表（MDSPSS）、SF 12健康调查和运动参与率。干预参与者的BDI在统计学上更好（t = 2.638，df = 36，p = 0.006，95%平均值（SD）26.5（10.7），CI-20.4至-2.7，d = 0.86），GHQ-12（t = 3.284，df = 36，p = 0.001，平均值（SD）8.3（3.7）95% CI -6.5至-1.5，d = 1.08），RSES（t = 2.045，df = 36，p = 0.024，平均值（SD）11.3（5.8），95%CI 0.3-6.4，d = 0.25），QLDS（t = 1.902，df = 36，p = 0.0325，平均值（SD）15.5（7.9），95% CI -12.2-0.4，d = 0.27）RPE评分（t = 1.755，df = 36，p = 0.0475，平均值（SD）9.2（3.2），95% CI -0.5 - 5.2，d = 0.77），参加更多的运动课程（t = 1.781，df = 36，p = 0.0415，课程数8（65%），95% CI-0.3 - 4.8，d = 0.58）。SF-12、MSPSS和HR在组间无显著差异。首选强度的运动可以改善心理，生理和社会结果，以及抑郁症女性的运动参与率。ClinicalTrials.gov：NCT00546221
Exercise may be effective in treating depression, but trials testing its effect in depressed women are rare. To compare the effect of exercise of preferred intensity with exercise of prescribed intensity in thirty-eight women living with depression. A Pragmatic RCT of 12 sessions of exercise at preferred intensity compared with 12 sessions at prescribed intensity. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSES), General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12), heart rate (HR), Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE), Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS), Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MDSPSS), SF12 Health Survey and exercise participation rates were compared between groups. Intervention participants had statistically better BDI (t = 2.638, df = 36, p = 0.006, 95% mean (SD) 26.5 (10.7), CI-20.4 to -2.7, d = 0.86), GHQ-12 (t = 3.284, df = 36, p = 0.001, mean (SD) 8.3 (3.7) 95% CI -6.5 to -1.5, d = 1.08), RSES (t = 2.045, df = 36, p = 0.024, mean (SD) 11.3 (5.8), 95% CI 0.3 -6.4, d = 0.25), QLDS (t = 1.902, df = 36, p = 0.0325, mean (SD) 15.5 (7.9), 95% CI -12.2 -0.4, d = 0.27) RPE scores (t = 1.755, df = 36, p = 0.0475, mean (SD) 9.2 (3.2), 95% CI -.5 - 5.2, d = 0.77) and attended more exercise sessions (t = 1.781, df = 36, p = 0.0415, number of sessions 8 (65%), 95% CI-0.3 -4.8, d = 0.58). SF-12, MSPSS and HR did not differ significantly between groups. Exercise of preferred intensity improves psychological, physiological and social outcomes, and exercise participation rates in women living with depression. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00546221
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Crone, Diane;Johnston, Lynne H;James, David V B
通讯作者：
James, David V B
影响因子：
8.1
作者：
Callaghan, Patrick;Khalil, Elizabeth;Morres, Ioannis
通讯作者：
Morres, Ioannis
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Craft, LL;Landers, DM
通讯作者：
Landers, DM
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Morgan, WP
通讯作者：
Morgan, WP
影响因子：
7.8
作者：
TuynmanQua, H;deJonghe, F;McKenna, SP
通讯作者：
McKenna, SP