Strategies for mHealth research: lessons from 3 mobile intervention studies.

Strategies for mHealth research: lessons from 3 mobile intervention studies.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s10488-014-0556-2
复制
发表时间:
2015-03
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Mohr, David C.
Mohr, David C.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ben-Zeev, Dror;Schueller, Stephen M.;Begale, Mark;Duffecy, Jennifer;Kane, John M.;Mohr, David C.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

移动医疗 (mHealth) 技术推动医疗保健向前发展的能力与通过仔细的移动医疗研究开发的移动干预措施的质量直接相关。移动医疗研究具有几个独特的特征,包括在项目的各个阶段与技术人员合作、对区域电信基础设施和商业移动服务提供商的依赖,以及参与者在不受控制的环境中使用移动工具的“野外”干预措施的部署和评估。在本文中,我们总结了我们的多机构/多学科团队在使用手机针对不同临床人群开展一系列移动医疗项目时所学到的经验教训。首先,我们描述了三个正在进行的项目,我们从中进行了整篇论文的说明。然后,我们提供了一个多学科团队合作和概念性移动医疗干预开发的示例,我们发现该示例特别有用。最后,我们讨论移动医疗研究挑战(即不断发展的技术、手机选择、用户特征、部署环境和移动医疗系统“错误和故障”),并提供识别和解决障碍或完全防止其发生的建议。
The capacity of Mobile Health (mHealth) technologies to propel healthcare forward is directly linked to the quality of mobile interventions developed through careful mHealth research. mHealth research entails several unique characteristics, including collaboration with technologists at all phases of a project, reliance on regional telecommunication infrastructure and commercial mobile service providers, and deployment and evaluation of interventions “in the wild”, with participants using mobile tools in uncontrolled environments. In the current paper, we summarize the lessons our multi-institutional/multi-disciplinary team has learned conducting a range of mHealth projects using mobile phones with diverse clinical populations. First, we describe three ongoing projects that we draw from to illustrate throughout the paper. We then provide an example for multidisciplinary teamwork and conceptual mHealth intervention development that we found to be particularly useful. Finally, we discuss mHealth research challenges (i.e. evolving technology, mobile phone selection, user characteristics, the deployment environment, and mHealth system “bugs and glitches”), and provide recommendations for identifying and resolving barriers, or preventing their occurrence altogether.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017
发表时间: 2013-08
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Kumar, Santosh;Nilsen, Wendy J.;Abernethy, Amy;Atienza, Audie;Patrick, Kevin;Pavel, Misha;Riley, William T.;Shar, Albert;Spring, Bonnie;Spruijt-Metz, Donna;Hedeker, Donald;Honavar, Vasant;Kravitz, Richard;Lefebvre, R. Craig;Mohr, David C.;Murphy, Susan A.;Quinn, Charlene;Shusterman, Vladimir;Swendeman, Dallas
通讯作者: Swendeman, Dallas
DOI: 10.1080/15487768.2012.733295
发表时间: 2012-01-01
期刊: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION
影响因子: --
作者:
Ben-Zeev, Dror;Drake, Robert;Depp, Colin
通讯作者: Depp, Colin
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.66.1.7
发表时间: 1998-02-01
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Chambless, DL;Hollon, SD
通讯作者: Hollon, SD
DOI: 10.1007/s10488-012-0424-x
发表时间: 2013-07
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Ben-Zeev, Dror;Davis, Kristin E.;Kaiser, Susan;Krzsos, Izabela;Drake, Robert E.
通讯作者: Drake, Robert E.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003353
发表时间: 2013
期刊: BMJ open
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Faurholt-Jepsen M;Vinberg M;Christensen EM;Frost M;Bardram J;Kessing LV
通讯作者: Kessing LV