Assessment of the Quality of Life during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Assessment of the Quality of Life during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
复制标题

评估Covid-19期间的生活质量大流行:来自沙特阿拉伯王国的横断面调查。

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph18030847
复制
发表时间:
2021-01-20
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zrieq R
Zrieq R
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Algahtani FD;Hassan SU;Alsaif B;Zrieq R

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

2019冠状病毒病爆发于二零二零年初成为持续危机。它在社区一级的可怕表现严重影响了所有个人生活质量的各个方面。该研究旨在检查沙特阿拉伯第一波COVID-19大流行期间生活质量的一些预测因素。采用横断面在线调查问卷收集参与者的社会人口学背景、身体健康状况、心理反应和生活质量数据。我们从世界卫生组织生活质量量表(WHOQOL-BREF)中选取了12个项目来评估QoL。抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-21(DASS-21)用于评估抑郁、焦虑和压力。使用中位数和四分位数间距描述QoL评分。计算生活质量评分四分位数与相关因素之间的多项式回归分析,统计学显著性设定为p < 0.05。多项回归分析的结果表明,(OR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.31-2.94);受试者年龄为26 - 35岁(OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.33-19.37);非沙特受试者(OR = 1.69; 95%CI = 1.06-2.57);慢性病个体(OR = 2.15; 95%CI = 1.33-3.48);失业者(OR = 2.18,95%CI = 1.04-4.57);(OR = 5.70; 95%CI = 3.59-9.05)、焦虑(OR = 5.47; 95%CI = 3.38-8.84)和压力(OR = 6.55; 95%CI = 4.01-10.70)更可能出现在生活质量评分的第一个四分位数中。虽然全模型预测总QoL评分具有统计学显著性(R2 = 0.962,F(750,753)= 16,705.4,p < 0.001),但三个QoL维度分别解释了环境、社会和宗教/精神维度的0.643、0.283和0.036的变异性。COVID-19大流行对个人生活质量的各个方面以及他们的身心健康产生了重大影响。需要采取以社区为基础的干预措施,以减轻大流行的负面影响,提高一般人群的健康和生活质量。
The COVID-19 outbreak emerged as an ongoing crisis at the beginning of the year 2020. Its horrific manifestation at the community level significantly affects various dimensions of the quality of life (QoL) of all individuals. The study aimed to examine some of the predictors of the QoL during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional online survey questionnaire was used to gather data on the participants’ sociodemographic backgrounds, physical health status, psychological reactions, and QoL. We adapted 12 items from the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instruments (WHOQOL-BREF) to assess the QoL. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale–21 (DASS-21) was used to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. The median and inter-quartile range were used to describe the QoL scores. A multinomial regression analysis was computed between QoL score quartiles and associated factors, and the statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The results of the multinomial regression analysis demonstrated that males (OR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.31–2.94); participants aged 26 to 35 years (OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.33–19.37); non-Saudi participants (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.06–2.57); individuals with chronic diseases (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.33–3.48); those who lost their job (OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.04–4.57); and those with depression (OR = 5.70; 95% CI = 3.59–9.05), anxiety (OR = 5.47; 95% CI = 3.38–8.84), and stress (OR = 6.55; 95% CI = 4.01–10.70) were more likely to be in the first quartile of the QoL scores. While the full model predicting the total QoL score was statistically significant (R2 = 0.962, F (750, 753) = 16,705.4, p < 0.001), the three QoL dimensions explained 0.643, 0.283, and 0.036 of the variability in environmental, social, and religious/spiritual dimensions, respectively. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced various aspects of individuals’ QoL, as well as their physical and psychological health. Community-based interventions are needed to mitigate the pandemic’s negative effects and enhance the health and QoL of the general population.
DOI: 10.3201/eid1007.030703
发表时间: 2004-07
影响因子: 11.8
作者:
Hawryluck L;Gold WL;Robinson S;Pogorski S;Galea S;Styra R
通讯作者: Styra R
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2014-9
发表时间: 2015-08-15
期刊: BMC public health
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Kim JH;Park EC
通讯作者: Park EC
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k
发表时间: 1995-11-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
KUYKEN, W;ORLEY, J;VANDAM, F
通讯作者: VANDAM, F
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.07.008
发表时间: 2021-06-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Greco, Francesco;Altieri, Vincenzo M.;Scarpa, Roberto M.
通讯作者: Scarpa, Roberto M.
DOI: 10.36131/cn20200205
发表时间: 2020-04-01
影响因子: 6.1
作者:
Mucci, Federico;Mucci, Nicola;Diolaiuti, Francesca
通讯作者: Diolaiuti, Francesca