Home for the Common Future (HCF): The use of home-meanings to promote domestic energy retrofit
Home for the Common Future (HCF): The use of home-meanings to promote domestic energy retrofit
复制标题
共同未来家园（HCF）：利用家园意义推动国内能源改造
DOI：
10.1016/j.erss.2023.103358
复制
发表时间：
2024
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
Bobrova Y
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bobrova Y
向房主推广能源改造是减少住宅运营能源使用和减缓气候变化的一项重要政策战略。能源研究和政策通常侧重于认知（逻辑）方面，以激励改造决策，如节省能源账单和健康考虑。然而，这种关注似乎忽视了房主自己如何理解低碳住宅的潜在好处的情感方面。为了涵盖能源改造决策的情感和认知方面，作者围绕perezhivanie（情感和认知体验）的概念开发了一个家庭意义框架。我们通过借鉴当前关于家庭意义的文献和经验见解来为我们的理论构建提供背景：(i) 18个案例研究，其中10个房主通过改造活动实现了显著的碳减排，而8个房主没有；（ii）利益相关者研讨会（n = 36），代表对推进英国国内能源改造活动感兴趣的各种参与者，如工业、政府、学术界、中介机构。我们分析了数据，以确定与低碳住宅相关的积极经验。这些体验分为五个主题：(i)控制自己的环境；（二）日常生活中的健康和幸福；（三）气候问题和关怀身份；（四）财务考虑和未来应变能力；个人与其环境之间的充分融合。作者开发了一个共同未来之家（HCF）启发式，它捕获了五个确定主题中的三个（ii-iv）。我们建议，该启发式可以用于推广低碳住宅的好处。
The promotion of energy retrofit to homeowners is an important policy strategy to reduce operational energy use in dwellings and mitigate climate change. Energy research and policy typically focus on thecognitive(logical) aspects to motivate retrofit decisions, such as savings on energy bills and health considerations. However, this focus appears to have neglected theemotionalaspects of how homeowners themselves make sense of the potential benefits of low-carbon dwellings.To encompass both the emotional and cognitive aspects of energy retrofit decisions, the authors developed ahome-meanings frameworkaround the concept ofperezhivanie(emotional and cognitive experience). We backgrounded our theoretical construction by drawing upon current literature of home-meanings and empirical insights from: (i) eighteen case studies, in ten of which homeowners achieved significant carbon emission reductions through retrofit activities, while in eight they did not; (ii) a stakeholder workshop (n = 36), representing various actors interested to advance domestic energy retrofit activities in the UK, e.g. industry, government, academia, intermediaries.We analysed the data to identify positive experiences associated with low-carbon dwellings. These experiences are organised in five themes: (i) control over one's environment; (ii)Health and well-being &Happiness in everyday life, (iii)Climate concerns &Caring identity, (iv)Financial considerations &Future-resilience; (v) a full integration between and individual and their environment. The authors developed aHome for theCommonFuture (HCF) heuristic, which captures three out of five identified themes (ii–iv). We suggest that the heuristic can be used for promoting the benefits of low-carbon dwellings.
登录
查看更多内容
无家可归和家的意义：无屋顶还是无根？
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00194.x
发表时间：
1992
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
P. Somerville
通讯作者：
P. Somerville
改造的驱动因素：针对房屋和居民的社会文化方法
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lise Tjørring;Q. Gausset
通讯作者：
Q. Gausset
激励缓解措施：当健康比气候变化更重要时
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
N. Petrović;J. Madrigano;Lisa Zaval
通讯作者：
Lisa Zaval
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1968
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
K. Dallett
通讯作者：
K. Dallett
The Word Associate 测试简介
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1992
期刊：
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior
影响因子：
--
作者：
William S. Verplanck
通讯作者：
William S. Verplanck