A Hierarchical (Multicomponent) Model of In-Group Identification: Examining in Russian Samples
A Hierarchical (Multicomponent) Model of In-Group Identification: Examining in Russian Samples
复制标题
群体内识别的分层（多成分）模型：在俄罗斯样本中进行检查
DOI：
10.1017/sjp.2015.37
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Osin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andrey Lovakov;E. Agadullina;E. Osin
本研究的目的是检验Leach等人（2008）在两项研究中使用俄罗斯样本（总N = 621）的群体内识别模型的效度和信度。在研究1中，一系列的多群体验证性因子分析表明，包含自我定义（个体自我刻板印象和群体内同质性）和自我投入（满意度、团结性和中心性）两个二阶因子的群体认同层次模型对种族、宗教、大学和性别四个群体认同（CFI >.93, TLI >.92, RMSEA < 0.06, SRMR < 0.06）的数据拟合较好，且拟合效果较好；与其他模型相比。研究2检验了俄文组内认同量表的结构效度和信度。结果表明，这些测量方法具有良好的心理测量特性。简而言之，我们的结果表明Leach等人的模型在俄罗斯文化中是可复制的。这一测量的俄语版本可以推荐用于未来在讲俄语的样本中进行的群体内研究。
Abstract The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of Leach et al.’s (2008) model of in-group identification in two studies using Russian samples (overall N = 621). In Study 1, a series of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the hierarchical model of in-group identification, which included two second-order factors, self-definition (individual self-stereotyping, and in-group homogeneity) and self-investment (satisfaction, solidarity, and centrality), fitted the data well for all four group identities (ethnic, religious, university, and gender) (CFI > .93, TLI > .92, RMSEA < .06, SRMR < .06) and demonstrated a better fit, compared to the alternative models. In Study 2, the construct validity and reliability of the Russian version of the in-group identification measure was examined. Results show that these measures have adequate psychometric properties. In short, our results show that Leach et al.’s model is reproduced in Russian culture. The Russian version of this measure can be recommended for use in future in-group research in Russian-speaking samples.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Lickel, B;Hamilton, DL;Uhles, AN
通讯作者：
Uhles, AN