University instructors’ use of questioning devices in mathematics textbooks: an instrumental approach

University instructors’ use of questioning devices in mathematics textbooks: an instrumental approach
复制标题

大学教师在数学教科书中使用提问装置:一种工具性方法

DOI:
10.1007/s11858-021-01296-5
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
ZDM – Mathematics Education
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Chamberlain, Lynn
Chamberlain, Lynn
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mesa, Vilma;Ma, Yue;Quiroz, Carlos;Gerami, Saba;Liakos, Yannis;Judson, Thomas;Chamberlain, Lynn

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本研究的目标是确定多种方式,教师利用设计成大学教科书,旨在邀请学生熟悉的内容之前,参加这样的内容将被讨论类的功能。我们提出了一个分析教师仪器的这一功能,我们称之为提问设备,使用数据从15名教师教微积分,线性代数,抽象代数超过一个学期。这些教师在美国14所不同的大学任教。我们确定了四个使用方案的提问设备,其中教师:完成提问设备的预先规划,要求学生完成提问设备的目的,教案,使用的目的,教学的提问设备,并要求学生完成的目的,评估的提问设备。这些计划的支持下,各种业务的不变量相关的自我认知,作为主管教师和教学的内隐理论。所确定的利用方案通知教科书开发人员和作者设计者,使他们意识到这些功能是否满足他们的设计目的,并可能考虑可能需要的变化,以支持教师实现他们的教学目标和改善学习。我们提出了一些进一步的调查领域。
The goal of this study is to identify the multiple ways in which instructors take advantage of a feature designed into university textbooks that seeks to invite students to get acquainted with the content prior to attending the class in which such content will be discussed. We present an analysis of teacher instrumentation of this feature, which we call questioning devices, using data from 15 instructors who taught calculus, linear algebra, or abstract algebra over one semester. The instructors taught at 14 different universities in the United States. We identified four utilization schemes of the questioning devices in which instructors: completed questioning devices for pre-planning, required students to complete the questioning devices for the purpose of lesson planning, used the questioning devices for the purpose of instruction, and required students complete the questioning devices for the purpose of assessment. These schemes are supported by various operational invariants related to self-perception as competent instructors and implicit theories of teaching and learning. The identified utilization schemes inform textbook developers and author-designers, making them aware of whether these features fulfill their design purposes, and possibly think about changes that might be needed to support instructors in achieving their instructional goals and improve learning. We suggest some further areas of inquiry.
走向实践的认知理论
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
G. Vergnaud
通讯作者: G. Vergnaud
DOI: --
发表时间: 2008
期刊: Comput. Educ.
影响因子: --
作者:
Kenneth Ruthven;S. Hennessy;Rosemary Deaney
通讯作者: Rosemary Deaney
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Jeffrey Choppin;Cynthia Carsons;Zenon Bory;C. Cerosaletti;Rob Gillis
通讯作者: Rob Gillis
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Sebastian Rezat
通讯作者: Sebastian Rezat
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
V. Mesa
通讯作者: V. Mesa