Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research.

Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-15
期刊:
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Schoffelen JM
Schoffelen JM
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gross J;Baillet S;Barnes GR;Henson RN;Hillebrand A;Jensen O;Jerbi K;Litvak V;Maess B;Oostenveld R;Parkkonen L;Taylor JR;van Wassenhove V;Wibral M;Schoffelen JM

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

脑磁图(MEG)记录是关于大脑中认知过程的神经动力学的丰富信息来源,具有良好的时间和空间分辨率。近年来,MEG硬件开发和方法有了相当大的进步。复杂的分析技术现在被常规应用并不断改进,从而对神经过程的复杂动力学产生了令人着迷的见解。然而,MEG研究中不同步骤的复杂程度迅速增加,这使得新手,有时甚至是专家,很难意识到可能的限制和警告。此外,MEG数据采集和数据分析的复杂性,需要特别注意在出版物中描述MEG研究,以促进解释和复制的结果。这份手稿旨在为一些重要的数据采集和数据分析步骤提出建议,并建议在报告MEG研究的手稿中应详细说明的细节。这些建议将有望作为指导方针,有助于加强在神经科学领域的MEG研究界的地位,并可能促进讨论,以进一步提高MEG研究的质量和影响。
Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings are a rich source of information about the neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes in the brain, with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In recent years there have been considerable advances in MEG hardware developments and methods. Sophisticated analysis techniques are now routinely applied and continuously improved, leading to fascinating insights into the intricate dynamics of neural processes. However, the rapidly increasing level of complexity of the different steps in a MEG study make it difficult for novices, and sometimes even for experts, to stay aware of possible limitations and caveats. Furthermore, the complexity of MEG data acquisition and data analysis requires special attention when describing MEG studies in publications, in order to facilitate interpretation and reproduction of the results. This manuscript aims at making recommendations for a number of important data acquisition and data analysis steps and suggests details that should be specified in manuscripts reporting MEG studies. These recommendations will hopefully serve as guidelines that help to strengthen the position of the MEG research community within the field of neuroscience, and may foster discussion in order to further enhance the quality and impact of MEG research.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143934
发表时间: 2011-01-01
影响因子: 18.4
作者:
Bullmore, Edward T.;Bassett, Danielle S.
通讯作者: Bassett, Danielle S.
DOI: 10.1159/000064444
发表时间: 2002-09-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Clementz, BA;Barber, SK;Dzau, JR
通讯作者: Dzau, JR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.020
发表时间: 2004-05-01
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Carbonell, F;Galán, L;Parra, M
通讯作者: Parra, M
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.050
发表时间: 2010-04-01
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Florin, Esther;Gross, Joachim;Timmermann, Lars
通讯作者: Timmermann, Lars
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395
发表时间: 1999-02-01
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Dale, AM;Fischl, B;Sereno, MI
通讯作者: Sereno, MI