Disentangling emotion processes in borderline personality disorder: physiological and self-reported assessment of biological vulnerability, baseline intensity, and reactivity to emotionally evocative stimuli.

Disentangling emotion processes in borderline personality disorder: physiological and self-reported assessment of biological vulnerability, baseline intensity, and reactivity to emotionally evocative stimuli.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/a0016392
复制
发表时间:
2009-08
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Linehan, Marsha A.
Linehan, Marsha A.
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kuo, Janice R.;Linehan, Marsha A.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究调查了符合边缘型人格障碍(BPD)标准的个体对情绪失调具有高度生物脆弱性的理论,包括高基线情绪强度和对情绪诱发刺激的高反应性。20名BPD患者,20名年龄匹配的广泛性社交焦虑障碍(SAD)患者和20名年龄匹配的正常对照(NC)参与了两个独立的情绪诱导条件,标准化条件和个人相关条件。在整个实验过程中收集呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)、皮肤电传导反应(SCR)和自我报告措施。与NC相比,BPD参与者表现出更高的生物脆弱性,如基础RSA降低所示。BPD参与者还表现出高基线情绪强度,其特征是基线时SCR升高和自我报告的负面情绪升高。然而,BPD组并没有表现出更高的反应性,因为他们的生理和自我报告的变化,从基线到情绪诱导任务并不大于其他两组。
This study investigated theory that individuals meeting criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) have high biological vulnerability to emotion dysregulation, including high baseline emotional intensity and high reactivity to emotionally-evocative stimuli. Twenty individuals with BPD, 20 age-matched individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder (SAD), and 20 age-matched normal controls (NC) participated in two separate emotion induction conditions, a standardized condition and a personally-relevant condition. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), skin conductance response (SCR), and self-report measures were collected throughout the experiment. BPD participants displayed heightened biological vulnerability compared with NC as indicated by reduced basal RSA. BPD participants also exhibited high baseline emotional intensity, characterized by heightened SCR and heightened self-reported negative emotions at baseline. However, the BPD group did not display heightened reactivity as their physiological and self-reported changes from baseline to the emotion inductions tasks were not greater than the other two groups.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb01982.x
发表时间: 1990-09-01
期刊: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
BERNTSON, GG;QUIGLEY, KS;BOYSEN, ST
通讯作者: BOYSEN, ST
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.05.007
发表时间: 2007-10-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Austin, Marilyn A.;Riniolo, Todd C.;Porges, Stephen W.
通讯作者: Porges, Stephen W.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.05.001
发表时间: 2005-01-01
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Ebner-Priemer, UW;Badeck, S;Bohus, M
通讯作者: Bohus, M
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511546396.007
发表时间: 2007-01-01
期刊: HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 3RD EDITION
影响因子: --
作者:
Dawson, Michael E.;Schell, Anne M.;Filion, Diane L.
通讯作者: Filion, Diane L.
DOI: 10.1007/bf02278016
发表时间: 2000-06-01
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Fukusaki, C;Kawakubo, K;Yamamoto, Y
通讯作者: Yamamoto, Y