On the invalidity of validity scales: evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples.
On the invalidity of validity scales: evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples.
复制标题
关于有效性量表的无效性：来自志愿者样本的自我报告和观察者评分的证据。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
A. Angleitner
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Piedmont;R. McCrae;R. Riemann;A. Angleitner
由于问卷回答中可能存在偏见和错误，许多人格问卷包括效度量表，旨在纠正有偏见的分数或确定无效的方案。作者在72名男性和106名女性的志愿者样本中评估了几种效度量表的有效性，这些志愿者完成了修订的NEO人格问卷(NEO-PI-R；P.T.Costa&R.R.McCrae，1992)和多维人格问卷(MPQ；A.TelLegen，1978/1982)，并由两名熟人以NEO-PI-R观察者的形式对其进行了评级。分析表明，效度指标在本样本中缺乏实用性。部分复制(N=1,728)也未能找到对效度量表使用的一致支持。作者阐述了告密者评分在评估礼仪有效性方面的应用，并认为心理评估员应该限制他们对效度量表的使用，转而寻求提高人格评估的质量。
Because of the potential for bias and error in questionnaire responding, many personality inventories include validity scales intended to correct biased scores or identify invalid protocols. The authors evaluated the utility of several types of validity scales in a volunteer sample of 72 men and 106 women who completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) and the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ; A. Tellegen, 1978/1982) and were rated by 2 acquaintances on the observer form of the NEO-PI-R. Analyses indicated that the validity indexes lacked utility in this sample. A partial replication (N = 1,728) also failed to find consistent support for the use of validity scales. The authors illustrate the use of informant ratings in assessing protocol validity and argue that psychological assessors should limit their use of validity scales and seek instead to improve the quality of personality assessments.
揭示感受：自我报告、同伴评价和行为中情感表达的各个方面。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Gross,JJ;John,OP
通讯作者：
John,OP
独自环球航行者的人生航程：理论与方法论视角的整合。
影响因子：
5
作者：
Nasby,W;Read,NW
通讯作者：
Read,NW