Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies.
Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph14080918
复制
发表时间：
2017-08-16
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gedikli C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Daniels K;Watson D;Gedikli C
有一致的证据表明，工作场所的良好社会环境与员工的福祉有关。然而，没有具体审查通过改善工作场所的社会环境来改善福祉的干预措施。我们对这些干预措施进行了系统的回顾，并将绩效视为一种结果。我们发现了八项干预研究。六项研究涉及基于将共享社交活动引入工作组的干预措施。六项研究中有六项表明，整个样本（五项研究）或一个可识别的亚组（一项研究）的福祉有所改善。五项研究中有四项表明社会环境有所改善，五项研究中有四项表明业绩指标有所改善。实施因素的分析表明，基于共享活动的干预措施需要一些外部的促进，有利的工人的态度干预之前，和几个不同的组成部分。我们发现了两项专注于改善工作场所公平感的研究。这些干预措施对幸福感或表现没有一致的影响。我们的结论是，有一些证据表明，干预措施，增加工人之间的共享活动的频率可以提高工人的福祉和性能。我们提出了改进证据基础的建议。
There is consistent evidence that a good social environment in the workplace is associated with employee well-being. However, there has been no specific review of interventions to improve well-being through improving social environments at work. We conducted a systematic review of such interventions, and also considered performance as an outcome. We found eight studies of interventions. Six studies were of interventions that were based on introducing shared social activities into workgroups. Six out of the six studies demonstrated improvements in well-being across the sample (five studies), or for an identifiable sub-group (one study). Four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in social environments, and four out of the five studies demonstrated improvements in indicators of performance. Analysis of implementation factors indicated that the interventions based on shared activities require some external facilitation, favorable worker attitudes prior to the intervention, and several different components. We found two studies that focused on improving fairness perceptions in the workplace. There were no consistent effects of these interventions on well-being or performance. We conclude that there is some evidence that interventions that increase the frequency of shared activities between workers can improve worker well-being and performance. We offer suggestions for improving the evidence base.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Moher D;Shamseer L;Clarke M;Ghersi D;Liberati A;Petticrew M;Shekelle P;Stewart LA;PRISMA-P Group
通讯作者：
PRISMA-P Group
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Ahmed, Ishfaq;Nawaz, Muhammad Musarrat
通讯作者：
Nawaz, Muhammad Musarrat
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph13111065
发表时间：
2016-10-31
影响因子：
--
作者：
Litchfield P;Cooper C;Hancock C;Watt P
通讯作者：
Watt P
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Bronkhorst, Babette;Tummers, Lars;Vijverberg, Dominique
通讯作者：
Vijverberg, Dominique
DOI：
10.1080/23303131.2015.1045108
发表时间：
2015-01-01
影响因子：
1.2
作者：
Lawrence, Catherine K.;Zeitlin, Wendy S.;Claiborne, Nancy
通讯作者：
Claiborne, Nancy