Night-time mobilities and (in)justice in London: Constructing mobile subjects and the politics of difference in policy-making
Night-time mobilities and (in)justice in London: Constructing mobile subjects and the politics of difference in policy-making
复制标题
伦敦的夜间流动性和（不）正义：构建流动主体和政策制定中的差异政治
DOI：
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102569
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
6.1
通讯作者：
Smeds E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Smeds E
人们对城市夜间经济和夜间交通政策的兴趣日益浓厚，这为研究如何在政策制定中构想和实施流动正义提供了一个重要背景。关于交通排斥和交通公正的文献记录了不同社会群体所经历的不利条件，并提出了分配公正和交通无障碍的理论框架。然而，这些文献很少考虑是否以及如何mobilitydifferenceis承认和规划的交通政策，包括审议正义（参与）和认知正义（知识生产）的问题的政治。为了解决这些研究差距，本文采用了Sheller（2018）的流动正义理论，并批判性地分析了夜间流动政策话语中移动的主体的构建。我们分析了大伦敦夜间政策的一部分政策文件，以研究不同社会类别（性别，年龄，种族，收入等）的夜间流动性差异的程度。换句话说，“差异政治”如何在交通政策制定中发挥作用。研究结果表明，伦敦的夜间政策的移动的科目的话语建设区分工人，消费者和交通用户，然而，这些广泛的类别不佳占差异化的流动性需求和做法。关于伦敦不同夜间交通的公开数据并没有为当前的政策讨论提供信息，掩盖了不同人群在夜间穿过城市时所经历的不利处境，从而限制了现有政策干预措施解决交通不公正问题的能力。这些研究结果重申，交通研究需要超越分配正义和无障碍分析，探索潜在的思考分配和认知正义的挑战现状的交通政策。
The growing interest in urban night-time economies and night-time transport policies presents an important context in which to examine how mobility justice is conceived and operationalised in policy-making. Literature on transport exclusion and transport justice documents the disadvantages experienced by different social groups and advances theoretical frameworks for distributive justice and transport accessibility. However, this literature has rarely considered the politics of whether and how mobilitydifferenceis recognised and planned for in transport policy, including issues of deliberative justice (participation) and epistemic justice (knowledge production). To address these research gaps, this paper engages with Sheller's (2018) theorisation of mobility justice and critically analyses the construction of mobile subjects in policy discourse on night-time mobility. We analyse policy documents part of night-time policy for Greater London to examine the extent to which the differentiated night-time mobilities across social categories (gender, age, ethnicity, income, etc.) are recognised – in other words, how the ‘politics of difference’ play out in transport policy-making. Findings show that the discursive construction of mobile subjects in London's night-time policy distinguishes between workers, consumers, and transport users, yet, these broad categories poorly account for differentiated mobility needs and practices. Publicly available data on differentiated night-time mobilities in London does not inform current policy discourse, obscuring disadvantages experienced by different groups of people moving through the city at night, and thus limits the capacity of existing policy interventions to address mobility injustices. These findings reaffirm the need for transport research to move beyond distributive justice and accessibility analysis, towards exploring the potential of thinking about distributive and epistemic justice for challenging the status quo of transport policy.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
9.8
作者：
M. Mladenović
通讯作者：
M. Mladenović
新自由主义主体性与英国城市夜间经济的发展
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Robert Shaw
通讯作者：
Robert Shaw
交通地理学：进入一个成熟的研究子学科的观点
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
A. Curl;Lisa Davison
通讯作者：
Lisa Davison
通勤和城市夜间：旅游和酒店工作中的夜间流动性
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
Tourism and the Night
影响因子：
--
作者：
Anna Plyushteva
通讯作者：
Anna Plyushteva
对夜间经济中犯罪和情感模糊的恐惧
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
J. Brands;T. Schwanen;Irina van Aalst
通讯作者：
Irina van Aalst